Close Menu
    Welt

    Großbritannien will Visumverbote für Einwanderer im Trump-Stil verhängen

    Share.
    View 12 Comments

    12 Kommentare

    1. gym_fun on

      10 year permanent settlement for asylum seekers is still better than TPS. The UK has taken 250k Ukraine refugees and 160k Hong Kong British nationals. It won’t be easy to absorb too many people in the UK.

    2. LittleSchwein1234 on

      I mean, fair enough. If countries can’t respect the rules and take back their nationals who have illegally entered the UK, what is the UK supposed to do to prevent this from happening? There aren’t many options left and you can’t work on a „rules for thee but not for me“ basis

    3. areyouhappylikethis on

      At this point, it doesn’t even matter how I personally feel about migrants. The hard left would be stupid to not recognise that public opinion is shifting towards Reform and that something needs to change to keep people happy. A compromise must be reached in order to prevent the hard right from taking control.

    4. WTFwhatthehell on

      >Shabana Mahmood, Britain’s chief interior minister, will announce Monday afternoon sweeping changes to the asylum system, including making refugee status temporary and requiring claimants to wait 20 years before applying for permanent settlement.

      >She will also bar the entry of people from Angola, Namibia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo if their governments do not improve cooperation on removing people who are judged not to have a right to remain in the U.K.

      This article seems to be making it very unclear what applies to visas and what applies to asylum.

      If countries refuse to take back people who have sought asylum and you punish them by refusing to accept people who seek asylum that’s a bit nonsensical.

      Like imagine the Kindertransport children had arrived in the UK and the government went „well the nazis have been terribly uncooperative with us so we’re sending you back…“

    5. Hefty_Macaroon_2214 on

      Only in a USA focused world ! It appears a much more Denmark style in the rest of the world where we don’t have an orange leader

    6. CarNeedsWashedYinzer on

      I’m so old I remember when Trump ran on banning on Muslims from entering the US and now he wines and dines a Saudi murderer in the white house. Wonder what changed? Oh yeah: billions in his and his families pockets.

    7. DeeperMadness on

      Isn’t that Shabana Mahmood, the politician in favour of chemical castration? I can’t say I would trust the judgement of someone who seems so insistent on demolishing human rights.

    9. Secret_Account07 on

      At least this is a fair policy. Okay maybe not fair but I can understand the reasoning

      Not like Trump where we are taking ppl who have spent their entire lives here and sending them to an unknown country. Thats not right on any level

    10. notinterested10002 on

      Smart move – western countries are definitely healthy and doing very well.

    12. codemonkeyius on

      It sounds pretty reasonable, when you read about it. Why should Angola etc be able to export the worst of their citizens into another country where they can run amok and damage the public commons there?

      The headline just wants the reader to have a kneejerk reaction.

    Leave A Reply