Der heute verabschiedete Gesetzentwurf war definitiv ein Mittel, um Pinkie Bondi die volle Befugnis zu geben, Daten zu schwärzen, wenn es sich um eine „Angelegenheit der nationalen Unzuständigkeit“ handelt.
Von recoveringboobaddict
Der heute verabschiedete Gesetzentwurf war definitiv ein Mittel, um Pinkie Bondi die volle Befugnis zu geben, Daten zu schwärzen, wenn es sich um eine „Angelegenheit der nationalen Unzuständigkeit“ handelt.
Von recoveringboobaddict
13 Kommentare
Thats a given. Only half the story will be released.
As a leftist, until context is provided as to what’s contained in these emails of public importance, what their pertinence is, why they are relevant, what conclusions may be derived from such a release, what emails were of importance in any investigations, what they believe the intent or purpose of said emails being written by whoever is believed to write them, and what context they provide to any investigation of public concern these emails are largely a useless heap.
Whether or not some of the information has been provided I do not know. Given that in my decades of attempting to locate condensed sources of information that appears to reliably be fact and inquire about sources of information not be aware of, all recent attempts to locate sources of strictly literal and non-hyperbolic information streams have been fruitless. Mind you, this includes many thousands of hours of attempting to locate even but one – but even when you find a promising lead where they may be publishing this literal and non-hyperbolic information, you eventually run across some blatant falsehoods that render it completely unreliable.
Further, despite efforts across several channels known to be used to convey information, despite my inquiries I have also never been notified as to which channels they communicate strictly facts and provide relevant public notices to the public.
The bill should have assigned an independent group of 3 people assigned by both parties to review all material, “classified” or not – which determines what is released. Period.
So, then it means our existing level of national security allows elite human trafficking, and that can’t be compromised?
…You really have to think backwards to make doublespeak make sense, but it is basically saying our national security level is low if anything Epstein was doing needs to be redacted, but also why is Epstein connected to national security in the first place.
gee I wonder whose name they’re going to redact
Word?
Watch them only name people that are already dead
And just like that, every mention of her boss’s name, was determined to „compromise national security“.
there is still the survivors of abuse intention to publish their own list of known abusers backed up by Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene offering to read those names on the floor of the house of us congress as to protect the survivors of abuse from being covered with defamation litigation
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/07/politics/jeffrey-epstein-victims-client-list
https://www.newsweek.com/epstein-list-could-read-congress-house-floor-thomas-massie-marjorie-taylor-greene-2124273
So, nothing ever happens?
Then the bill dont have to be approved then
The full fucking thing gonna be redacted
Well, since Trump ordered Bondi to go after his enemies and their association with Epstein I guess we won’t be seeing those names either.