427 stimmten mit „Ja“ für die Veröffentlichung der Epstein-Akten, 1 stimmten mit „Nein“.
Von onemansquadron
427 stimmten mit „Ja“ für die Veröffentlichung der Epstein-Akten, 1 stimmten mit „Nein“.
Von onemansquadron
35 Kommentare
Wait I thought there weren’t any Epstein files?
Representative Clay Higgins (R-LA) was the no vote. But in my opinion, on a subject like this, „not voting“ might as well be treated as a no vote as well.
Clay Higgins apparently
Clay Higgins from Louisiana.
How much do you want to bet it will be heavily redacted
remember this day….
it might not end the way you think it will end…
Now can we all agree theres no 2 party system… They all talk to each other and work together.
Hey look we did a thing together. $10 we still don’t find out shit.
Clay „pedo protector“ Higgins, good job electing such a strong, powerful protector of kid fuckers Louisiana
So when is this shit actually gonna get released?
The people of Louisiana would like to have a fucking word, Clay. & you know we don’t play.
Yes.
The dude from the same state as the weenie of a speaker, who’d have thought?
Now we might get a better picture of who the pedophiles in the senate are
In the meantime, someone should ask Cindy McCain some more questions.
„We all knew what he was doing, but we had no one — no legal aspect that would go after him. They were afraid of him. For whatever reason, they were afraid of him.“
-Cindy McCain
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4849210/user-clip-cindy-mccain-admits-knew-epsteins-trafficking
If it’s heavily redacted again there will be chaos
[Clay Higgins](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2025/11/18/esptein-house-representative-voted/)
Why do they use fonts from 90s broadcast TV in 2025?
The FBI probably already scrubbed what Trump wanted.
They have all been told that with AI, Quantum Computing, Big Data, and good ol‘ „Redacting“ – that they have created a whole set of safe *fake* files, and that no one in the house will be identified. Hence, why the near unanimous vote in favour of releasing the files
All the people in the picture that is featured.
Its crazy how they’re going to redact something that didnt exist
Oh I bet some that voted yes are pedos too but know their names have been redacted, so they are fine, nothing to see here. Someone (if not many people out there) has an unredacted copy of these files, needs to step up and be the hero the world needs right now by leaking them ahead of the BS the Trump Administration is going to try and feed us as being the truth.
zero independents. would be nice to see that change.
Everything but the page numbers will be blacked out.
First 1 side doesn’t want it released, then the other side doesn’t want it released and now all of a sudden they all (except 1) want it released…
🤔
Clay Higgins is not a pedophile. If he voted no, there is a damn good reason and he is trying to draw attention to it at his own peril. Everyone should be very concerned.
I can’t imagine calling someone something so vile with zero evidence. There will be a karmic reckoning I truly believe.
I’ve been falsely accused of a crime before and going through *that* really sucked. I’d love to see everyone who accused someone with zero evidence get sued into lifetime homelessness.
A large portion of the 428 of them
Spiderman meme
Donald Trump. Clay Higgins is dumb as a bag of rocks and he literally supported David Duke’s the run for governor.
Trick question they all are
Those satanists ain’t gonna show us anything
Let’s not forget most of Hollywood, Isreal , Scienctolgy , cult leaders, cult members, Gacy, Jerry Seinfeld, former Sunday school teachers, current Sunday school teachers ,Jeffery Jones, Gary Glitter, billionaires, etc……
Louisiana (R)
unfortunately, since r/Conspiracy does not know how to read (IQ < 80), they won’t be able to read the primary source material
and will have to be ‚told‘ what spin they are to believe by others on reddit
cue the armchair prosecutors, lawyers, investigators, and spin doctors