Mike Johnson kündigt an, dass der Senat den Epstein-Gesetzentwurf ändern wird, um „Opfer und Whistleblower“ zu schützen. Es schützt bereits die Opfer, daher vermute ich, dass der neue Gesetzentwurf die Namen der Mitverschwörer schwärzen wird, die zu vertraulichen Informanten wurden, also der Hunde, die nicht bellten. Das Update ist da.
Von PositiveZeroPerson
11 Kommentare
How convenient that Johnson put it out there that Trump was an informant a few months ago!
[Mike Johnson claimed Trump was anti-Epstein informant, then retreated amid criticism](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/08/mike-johnson-trump-epstein-fbi-informant)
To me it seems absurdly naive that, even if there ever was anything to them, that you would get anything meaningful at this point since it has been handled under 4 administrations. Perhaps 7. In fact, we’re long past the point where we could even begin to trust anything released, no matter who is on them.
The only way I will believe any of it is if it reveals global participants and the consequences ripple out across the entire western world AND results in real, meaningful punishments and changes.
None of this is happening. It’s just going to be a political hot potato for NPC theatrics from administration to administration.
This has the CIA’s DNA all over it. This is how they divert, distract and engineer populations and civilizations. They create an issue that can’t be and won’t be proven, force you to fixate and attack that thing, and they will never ever have to reveal anything real or tangible. It’s exactly what they did with the vaccines, the 911 narrative, the Epstein list, the various assassination attempts.
There’s plenty of real and verifiable illegal, corrupt, treasonous, heinous and downright crimes against humanity things going on in which our governmental/political class were and are actively involved. Many good Americans have been deleted to bring you this information and nobody does anything with it. They just turn in unison on the next fixation and drop the thing that was oh so important yesterday. Anyone with any intelligence observes this nature among all of you, so who is going to martyr themselves to bring you any more truth? You are all the Jerry Springer spectator.
Child porn is the perfect accusation. You can say anyone had it, you can even plant it on them, but no evidence can be showcased because its very observation and creation is illegal. But it’s those applying the law who created it (FBI and CIA). You can control politicians and anyone in position of influence with it. You merely have to say they have it and the world can never know better and everyone readily believes it.
You all want your little list of names so you can have your dopamine-laced arguments when you don’t want to do anything at all about the system that facilitates and normalizes all of it. Just pay your taxes, get your iPhones, and feign spectator outrage. The show will go on.
Submission statement: It is very clear that the Epstein bill was going to pass, and now it appears there is a conspiracy in which the Republicans are going to try to amend the Senate version of the bill to protect people other than victims. Remember, the original sweetheart deal was written by Alex Acosta to protect all of Epstein’s clients while giving Epstein a pass. Mike Johnson believed that Trump was a [confidential informant](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIqoQFi6UFE), and so did [Epstein himself](https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/11/jeffrey-epstein-emails-michael-wolff-journalism-trump.html).
The problem is that confidential informants are almost without exception guilty of crimes themselves, and they get off by providing information to the police. They are going to try and redact Trump’s name as a so-called „whistleblower.“
I can see the rationale for redacting victim names and illegal material, but nothing else should be redacted whatsoever. The Senate should pass the House bill as-is.
And just like that everyone on the client list is now a whistleblower.
I can’t believe yall ever thought the government would tell on themselves. We were never getting the full unredacted info.
How convenient that Johnson floated the idea that Trump was an informant a few months ago. He walked it back of course, but that won’t matter.
If Trump was a whistleblower, he should be proud of that 🙂
Anything less than a FULL release of the files is an admission of guilt.
So are we supposed to believe the dude who’s had 50 or so unhinged rants about the “Epstein Hoax” was really an informant. Anyone who falls for this horseshit is too stupid to be allowed to vote.
Why do we as a people allow them to continue to lie to our faces like this?
I don’t think it’s a question of who’s on it, it’s more likely who’s not on it at this point.
This file has been sitting out there since Trump’s first administration . If there was anything truly negative on this about Trump, it would’ve been released at this point.
The reason it hasn’t it’s either a nothing burger or implicates and is tied to b even more people .
I believe the truth of this file is that it implicates not just politicians but key players and business and entertainment. It will also tie back directly to this information, being collected and used by Israel to affect US policy. This includes Democrats Republicans and anyone else.
I mean Epstein was texting Stacey Plaskett, you know one of Reddits little darlings, directly during a hearing and offering advice on shot to say, which she did. But nothing to see here.
That’s the reason this file is being redacted or not shared at this point . It would basically bring down the current political structure of the US government and permanently damage the public perception of Israel and by extension Jews in general.