Close Menu
    Europa

    Polen lehnt ein verbindliches EU-Gesetz zur „Chat-Kontrolle“ zur Bekämpfung von Kindesmissbrauch ab

    Share.
    View 45 Comments

    45 Kommentare

    2. Longjumping-Boot1886 on

      ‚fight child abuse‘ also should be at brackets here.

      The main idea of this law if someone like Orban or that guy from Serbia are taking the country they could easily make surveillance and „eliminate threat“.

    4. guoj1487 on

      Fight child abuse, but not really. To spy on every European citizen more like. Except the politicians of course.

    5. prof_dr_mr_obvious on

      „to fight child abuse“ between a few big, fat quotes that is. Chat control would be a gross invasion of everyone’s privacy and treating everyone like a criminal. And besides that isn’t going to work at all.

    7. CrazyWriterHippo on

      If you want to fight child abuse, just jail every politician and be done with it.

    8. bxzidff on

      Disgusting how many European politicians are so eager to turn their countries into police states. You’d think both the west and east remembered what the iron curtain was like, it’s not that long ago

    9. Nice-Appearance-9720 on

      The countries that care soo much about fighting child abuse could fist start with the orange file in Washington, before shaking hands with him.

    10. silentspectator27 on

      It’s almost a 100 percent certain the Council will agree to this unanimously. Our hope now is in Parliament and the Courts. No back doors, no mandatory age verification.

    11. schavi on

      let’s not spread the justification of these measures as something that is valid.

      this is not to ‚fight child abuse‘.

      this is not an useful tool against child abuse and it’s implementation has far more drastic consequences that are made to seem irrelevant with this sorta phrasing.

    12. hamstar_potato on

      Poland is gathering fanboys and fangirls. The Germany thing was nonsensical and funny, but I respect them for being againt chat control for whatever reason they have. Hope they have the same stance on Digital Omnibus, ProtectEU, age verifications and the such.

      I’m starting to think all the politicians supporting this are either on the Epstein list, have friends on the Epstein list or are into a pedo ring at home. What’s this obsession with kids? And that’s on top of a boner for complete thoughts control.

      Also, can „the news“ stop spreading misinformation that this is for the kids? They’re lying.

    13. Eokokok on

      I don’t understand this headline, so we are against it because that stance helps us fight child abuse? Or has average journo became an AI driven moron at this point?

    15. Szymon_Patrzyk on

      „law to fight child abuse“
      every expert ever disagrees. This is a surveilence law. This is a law that would not only monitor your messages, it’d provide every message you have ever sent, whether deleted or not, directly to the authorities, who will then jail you on thought crimes

    16. cassanderer on

      I am sure those kids will appreciate the protection that comes from an all encompassing techno fascist plutocracy that relegates them to starvation wages for life.

    17. MyPinkFlipFlops on

      Ah yes, lets say that chat control is meant to fight child abuse to make opposing it seem grossly immoral

    18. LoveThinkers on

      The year is 2035, if the people have a thought not cleared for free thinking, a shovel will hit them in the face at initiation of said thought.
      The politician is of course excluded, and the people are not allowed to think of that.

      Now sir, move along

    22. Low_Technician7346 on

      The danish politician who was in favor of chatcontrol recently got jailed because of pedophile content found on his computer.

      Anyone claiming that we should sacrifice some liberty to protect the children should be audited because they are often related to such shady activities.

    27. lempickalover on

      I love these comments. They’re trying so hard to wrap up their authoritarian surveillance law under pretty packaging, but so many people see right through their bs. It’s not a law to fight child abuse, it’s a law to curtail our freedoms and right to privacy. Let’s always call it like it is.

    28. iaNCURdehunedoara on

      Really cool how manufacturing consent is done in real time. They put a spyware bill under the guise of „combating child abuse“ and if you oppose the bill to spy on all of us they say you don’t care about children lmao

      There are already plenty of ways to combat child abuse, they just want to spy on us

    32. CaptchaSolvingRobot on

      Child abuse is the default explanation when they want to erode your right to privacy.

      They want too paint anyone who objects as a filthy pedo.

    33. PowerOfUnoriginality on

      While obviously child abuse needs to be prevented (duh), I do not think chat control is the way to do it.

      And as u/ReacherNMN said: „if it’s about child abuse then why are politicians exempted?“

    34. AtraVenator on

      > to fight child abuse

      Come on now EU how retarded do you think we are 😄

    35. La_mer_noire on

      If this law doesn’t pass, with the nerve of these MPs in the eu parlement the next one will be „chat control to protect puppy abuse“

      Then, „chat control to fight cancer“

    38. dhruan on

      „To fight child abuse“? Bullshit, talk about throwing the baby (in this case, fundamental rights and any expectation of privacy) out with the bathwater. This is a tool for internal state surveillance and espionage on their citizens, and thus, totally antithetical to the European project.

    39. Express_Ad5083 on

      The closer someone is to Epstein the more they like this law, weird right?

    40. JayR_97 on

      They always go with the „Won’t someone please think of the children!!!“ angle when pushing this Orwellian bullshit

    42. NewspaperNice1512 on

      Poland opposes mandatory EU chat control law to ‘fight child abuse’

      Fixed that for you

    Leave A Reply