I feel like the Hubble Constant should not be called a constant, but beyond that, the issue is the assumption that all „standard candle“ supernovas are the same universally, and I somehow feel that’s not the case. If we averaged the two major camps of expansion rates to around 70km/s/Mpsc, then recalculate the data from these „standard candles“ we may find ourselves with a graph that may show us something we’re missing.
Any thoughts?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
1 Kommentar
I feel like the Hubble Constant should not be called a constant, but beyond that, the issue is the assumption that all „standard candle“ supernovas are the same universally, and I somehow feel that’s not the case. If we averaged the two major camps of expansion rates to around 70km/s/Mpsc, then recalculate the data from these „standard candles“ we may find ourselves with a graph that may show us something we’re missing.
Any thoughts?