Close Menu
    Meta zur Beurteilung von Mitarbeiterleistungsbeurteilungen anhand der KI-Nutzung im Jahr 2026
    Technik

    Meta zur Beurteilung von Mitarbeiterleistungsbeurteilungen anhand der KI-Nutzung im Jahr 2026

    Share.
    View 28 Comments

    28 Kommentare

    1. OriginalTechnical531 on

      „If we can’t generate enough use by users, we will just use it ourselves!“

    2. TerranOPZ on

      Isn’t this just the same thing as when he forced employees to use Metaverse (AKA Horizon Worlds)?

    4. Chilledlemming on

      They are doing it everywhere. Rather than actually strategize and workshop, they want to micromanage employees to produce something with AI – which of course is perfect and beyond reproach. People in my office started getting emails last month if they weren’t “engaging AI” enough.

    7. cas201 on

      I’d say 80% of metas interactions. And therefore revenue comes from bots and AI. I just hope the advertisers find out soon and rank this company

    8. RedBoxSquare on

      Can I automate with a bot that talks to ChatGPT for me and claim I’m using AI?

    9. TheJesterOfHyrule on

      I too would force people to when i know there will be a decline and pop soon as it’s 5 billionaires circling jerking it

    10. jupfold on

      I don’t why this would surprise anyone. I first had AI as a goal in my performance review in 2024.

    14. Acadia02 on

      Jokes on them I screen shot all my safety trainings and ask their internal ai for the answers

    15. Fit-Property3774 on

      The accounting firm I work for has also made AI usage a tracked metric with a minimum requirement and it will be used during our end of year evaluations. Really fuckin stupid.

    16. Shawn_NYC on

      You guys know why they’re doing this right? It’s to train the AI how to do your job so they can fire you. The AI isn’t there to make you more productive, you’re there to train it how to replace you.

    18. Silent_Calendar_4796 on

      What a disaster that will be. Perhaps fix Facebook, because it’s buggy as hell.

    21. DystopianRealist on

      To be fair, most of my employers have put less thought into my performance reviews than AI will. Maybe it can even hallucinate something lawsuit worthy.

    22. Laughing_Zero on

      Often managers have no idea how to evaluate people; many don’t even know what their employee actually does or what’s involved in a function.

      AI is just another way to devalue people and their skills & abilities.

    25. NebulousNitrate on

      I work at a large/prestigious tech company where we have quarterly reviews. This last quarterly review another manager was telling me in our review tool he was being trialed for an „auto review“ option. He was curious how it worked so with one of his reports he tried it (after asking his report if it was okay). Thankfully it didn’t auto-submit the review, but it basically took the reports‘ self-submitted review and „analyzed“ it and then looked at our source control/work item engineering systems to see if it was „accurate“.

      It didn’t work very well, and add a bunch of bloat filler content, but it was able to detect one of the reports larger code PRs had to be refactored numerous times and called him out on it.

      It’s a bit scary, because the individual contributors are now being A/B tested with a tool option to generate their own self-review to submit to their manager. So if both of them go live, you’re going to have an AI generated report „reviewed“ by another AI, and the resulting AI generated managers report will be used when factoring in reward/compensation.

    Leave A Reply