Marco Rubio: Die EU hat nicht das Recht, internationales Recht für die USA zu definieren
Marco Rubio: EU does not have the right to define international law for U.S.
Von Crossstoney
Marco Rubio: Die EU hat nicht das Recht, internationales Recht für die USA zu definieren
Marco Rubio: EU does not have the right to define international law for U.S.
Von Crossstoney
25 Kommentare
This guy is gonna be creeping around the republican HQ like Gollum for decades after all this is over.
„*The senior U.S. diplomat did not specify in what context the European Union has addressed international law regarding the U.S.*“
Man you murricans just love to be big mouths…
The EU is just so emberassing nowadays, my godness
the US also don’t have the right to commit war crimes all over the world, but yet here we are.
Translation: US makes its own rules.
Just one more example of why hard power matters.
But the USA believes they can be police, judge and executioner by sinking boats and killing their crew in international waters. 🤦🏻♂️
Under Trump and Marco Rubio U.S. no longer follows international law even as it was understood under the first Trump Administration, the „law“ they follow is closer to Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte because they’ve gone full dictator/banana republic mode.
But the USA can define international
Law for the eu…. It’s like Russians can build a huge military base a few kms from Lithuania or Estonia but Estonian troops powering up a flashlight means a threat to world peace ….
Bs
When the US is acting like a terrorist organisation and destroying fishing boats on the premise of stopping drug trafficking in international waters then it is every countries right to challenge them.
The US border control could have tracked them until they entered US waters and arrested everyone on board, seized their cargo, and showed it as evidence. They could then have detained them or deported them, as far as I know the US doesn’t issue death sentences for drug smugglers.
However the US authorities have not issued one shred of evidence to support their intelligence’ and they have already declared their interest in enforcing a regime change linked with Oil reserves.
This has zero to do with stopping drug smuggling and everything to do with Trump being the head of a terrorist organisation.
However, the EU (And frankly any nation and anyone) has the right to address their own responses to the US breaking international law, such as the UK ceasing intelligence sharing in respect of attacking boats off the coast of South American nations. The US is going to do what it wants, there’s no one with the will or ability to stop them over most matters, but it’s losing the good will and support of its friends.
The US had the arrogance to criticise the UK for hiring a UK company to build a nucelear power station (It’s not a full power station but I forget the term that is truly accurate). I mean, just fuck off, just become the insular nation that you promised you were going to be.
At least it will hasten, slightly, the break from the odious US influence.
No but we can define EU law, so he can fuck right off.
Disregard him, he’s a Far-Right Trump stooge to spearhead our Fake-president’s wackass of foreign policy
What is the OMIDradio? Kabul? Sounds like a shady as fuck news source.
oh how the turnables…
Don’t worry. My EU friends will love daddy even harder tomorrow. They are just addicted to Daddy’s wins
That’s rich considering the US has been blackmailing the EU over enforcing its own laws against US tech giants or propping up separatists in Greenland.
hypocrisy par excellance, what else is new
I keep waiting for his big ears to fly him off to somewhere else.
Hopefully to irrelevance.
Edit for big eared clarity.
LOL, since when does the US let anyone else define their rules? 😂 But fr, isn’t this whole thing about cooperation? A lil’ irony in saying the EU can’t weigh in.
International Law exists for all nations just because America chooses not to abide by it does not make it right that is why we have bodies like the UN, WHO & ICC. There are countries rising like Syria, Venezuela, Serbia, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger & Vietnam and if the EU expects to hold these countries to our standards than the rule-based order should apply to all countries that means if one power decides to invade or regime change a country they should face the consequences and justice be applied for war crimes committed.
Taste of your own medicine, little Marco.
USA: Right for me, but not for you
But the US can define the „rules based order“ worldwide? Oh f off!
“In the past few years, the phrase Chinese people have heard the most is ‘rules-based international order.’”But the actual ‘rules’ are:
1. The U.S. is always right.
2. If it isn’t, see rule #1