Subnationaler Human Development Index (HDI) nach Region (2023)(OC)
Von midlife_cl
Subnationaler Human Development Index (HDI) nach Region (2023)(OC)
Von midlife_cl
16 Kommentare
Cool observation: Norway, Iceland and Switzerland are the only countries whose all subnational entities have an HDI above 0.950, with Iceland being the most developed country in the world, and the canton of Zurich as the most developed subnational entity with an HDI of 0.993.
[Ranking with the updated top 25 global and top 10 highest/lowest by region.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_subnational_entities_with_the_highest_and_lowest_Human_Development_Index)
[Source.](https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/table/shdi/?levels=1+4&years=2023&interpolation=0&extrapolation=0)
Weird but not unpleasant to see the five provinces of Wallonia above 0.900 HDI (tho it’s not that surprising for Walloon Brabant).
Greenland’s Human Development Index (HDI) has varied over time, but a 2010 estimate placed it at 0.786, which is considered „High“.
In Syria, subnational HDI varies by governorate, with As-Suwayda having the highest 2022 score of (0.604), followed by Latakia ((0.599)) and Damascus ((0.595)). Raqqa has the lowest score at (0.499), while the national average was (0.557) in 2022. These figures indicate significant disparities in human development across the country’s regions.
Chile can into purple….people eater.
Why is Kosovo the only European country in red?
Why does Kosovo have HDI on pair with Central Africa? xD
That surely has to be a mistake.
Poor New Mexico…so far from God and so close to Colorado.
Yemen is indeed the poorest country in the middle east.
Why is the UK split by NUTS2 unlike the others
Why are they using federal okrugs instead of actual Russian regions? It’s like saying „HDI of Midwest“ instead of breaking down by state
Get ready for comments „no way my country is that high“ 🤯
what’s up with the yellow in afghanistan?
Crazy to see Ohio and North Dakota ahead of regions in France, Spain and Italy with frequent high speed rail service
russian one irks me because its Federal Districts (a subdivision no one really cares about) as opposed to regions (the subdivision that actually matters)
its not like theres a „federal district budget“ that spends money on anything we actually care about
regions keep our roads going, pay for our universities, contribute to city budgets and large projects (like dams and bridges) etc
and theres a lot of inequality from region to region within a district
Louisiana ain’t purple but i guess green is good enough 🙁
HDI defines multiple tiers clearly. There’s no need to reinvent them for a graph. Just use the formally defined tiers .