Wer zahlt, wenn KI falsch liegt?
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/business/media/ai-defamation-libel-slander.html
Wer zahlt, wenn KI falsch liegt?
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/business/media/ai-defamation-libel-slander.html
22 Kommentare
They should invent an AI leader or godfather.
Ans threaten to pull the plug if he doesn’t – keep things in check.
Holy crap, they lost millions in sales because of a bogus Google AI search. The amount of disinfo being proliferated by AI and bots is just staggering. And crickets from Congress for putting any sort of guard rails on this insanity.
I’ve seen people post screencaps of AI overviews during online arguments.
It is going to get a lot worse before it gets better (if ever).
The same people who always do, the taxpayers/citizens.
[deleted]
Depending on rulings like this can kill AI
This isn’t really in question as all the elements needed for defamation against the LLM’s creator is there.
1) People believed the claims made by the LLM.
2) The company knew the LLM was wrong a significant percentage of the time.
3) There was specific monetary damages from the false claims made by the LLM.
I hope they sue them into the ground. This is going to keep happening and it’s going to keep damaging people. Llms are nothing more than a parlor trick.
Well, it’s not going to be the ones who should.
I think an easy way to handle these legal issues is to ask if a human consultant gave the same wrong information, would they be culpable? Most often the answer would probably be yes.
shit rolls downhill
Nobody should, why are we expecting perfect accuracy from a statistical model?
We wanted it that way.
Kim Kardashian?
Suicidal teenagers and their families
why not the AI company?
I asked AI. It said „your mom“
anyone who is not millionaire and above.
>“There’s no question that these models can publish damaging assertions“ … “The question,” Mr. Volokh said, “is who is responsible for that?”
Except the model isn’t the publisher, the company is. That’s like saying I’m not responsible for something I post because my keyboard’s predictive text function came up with the words.
A bogus Google Gemini search result told a company’s customers that they had been sued by the government over fraudulent business practices. $388k in cancelled contracts.
Americans, despite being warned early and often.
These seem like really good questions let’s take a moment and have a thoughtful and nuanced conversation about the real world applications and the ethical implications .
Ai doesnt have agency. If you repeat some bogus shit generated by a computer. Thats on you. Whoevr chooses to automate a task still has to take responsibility for the outcome otherwise it doesnt make sense. This is good for both the ai company and the ai user. If the customer knows they must take responsibility they should think carefully before buying an ai product, incentivizing ai companies to build something actually competent while at the same time not having to take liability for everything that the tool is used for.