>’BBC Bias‘ Memo Was Authored by Lobbyist Tied to Pro-Trump Tech Giants
Yeah… Sorry I thought that was obvious
quentinnuk on
Doesn’t matter. Panorama still did a bad thing, even if the whistle blow was political.
MuhammadAkmed on
The BBC employs David Grosman and he wrote the review as part of his job
The BBC hired Michael Prescott was hired as an independent reviewer and he based the memo on Zavids work.
Byline times is such shite
Darrenb209 on
What’s with all these articles trying to discredit the memo by discrediting the man behind it?
The assertions were not made in a vacuum, even the more dubious ones he provided some evidence for and as such the whole thing can be challenged properly if people are that determined to criticise it.
Attacking a person’s character rather than their arguments is fallacious; even a broken clock is right twice and a terrible person can do the right thing for the wrong reason.
Gentle_Snail on
The right conspiring to destroy the BBC? Well I never
Disillusioned_Pleb01 on
The oligarchs want the game all to themselves, leaving the public exactly where they want them.
Luficer_Morning_star on
The bbc have fucked this. The right will hammer them with everything they have . The Americans will jump on with the law suits which he has basically won. He has admitted in public basically they did it.
Even Boris Johnson who is popular among people who actually pay it and said to not pay.
Any-Swing-3518 on
Yeah, sure… *“pro Trump tech giants“*, that’s who it is… In fact, there are a lot of people in the BBC who were party to the take down of Corbyn who didn’t think the leopard would eat *their* face.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
8 Kommentare
>’BBC Bias‘ Memo Was Authored by Lobbyist Tied to Pro-Trump Tech Giants
Yeah… Sorry I thought that was obvious
Doesn’t matter. Panorama still did a bad thing, even if the whistle blow was political.
The BBC employs David Grosman and he wrote the review as part of his job
The BBC hired Michael Prescott was hired as an independent reviewer and he based the memo on Zavids work.
Byline times is such shite
What’s with all these articles trying to discredit the memo by discrediting the man behind it?
The assertions were not made in a vacuum, even the more dubious ones he provided some evidence for and as such the whole thing can be challenged properly if people are that determined to criticise it.
Attacking a person’s character rather than their arguments is fallacious; even a broken clock is right twice and a terrible person can do the right thing for the wrong reason.
The right conspiring to destroy the BBC? Well I never
The oligarchs want the game all to themselves, leaving the public exactly where they want them.
The bbc have fucked this. The right will hammer them with everything they have . The Americans will jump on with the law suits which he has basically won. He has admitted in public basically they did it.
Even Boris Johnson who is popular among people who actually pay it and said to not pay.
Yeah, sure… *“pro Trump tech giants“*, that’s who it is… In fact, there are a lot of people in the BBC who were party to the take down of Corbyn who didn’t think the leopard would eat *their* face.