Close Menu
    Politics

    Der Oberste Gerichtshof der USA erlaubt dem Trump-Administrator, die vollständige Finanzierung der SNAP-Zahlungen vorerst zu vermeiden

    Share.
    View 35 Comments

    35 Kommentare

    4. winkitywinkwink on

      Why.

      Also, why isn’t it mandatory that the Justices give their reasoning as to why they made their ruling?

    5. ImpressiveReview4573 on

      mine aswell its not like he will release the full snap benifts he doesn’t care about democracy.

    8. Many-Lengthiness9779 on

      Protest in their neighborhoods, bang spoons on drums. They don’t deserve a break from their madness. 

    11. iseethemgoats on

      When level of evil are you on when you go crying to your pocket supreme court on a Friday night to make sure you can starve poor children?

    13. NeededToChooseAName on

      „So why don’t you want people to eat again?“

      „Because if we give them SNAP benefits we’ll lose the leverage to get what we want“

      „And what is it you want the leverage for to get?“

      „Denying everyone healthcare.“

    15. Guacsalsaqueso on

      I hope Newsom becomes President in 2028, not because I agree with him on everything, but he will make it his life’s mission to make every piece of garbage in our government pay for what they’ve done to us. I want him to go completely unhinged and make them all regret their treasonous actions 

    16. ElleM848645 on

      Ok so another article I read said Katanji Brown issued the stay, but this one says John Roberts did. So which is it?

    17. emotionless-pig476 on

      omfg ugh i cannot stand this country being ran by absolute fucking idiots

    18. burglin on

      Horrible for every SNAP recipient who didn’t vote for him. Absolutely inhumane. Happy for the others to starve, though. They voted for this and are inflicting hunger on others. For that, they deserve it.

    19. WHSRWizard on

      1. This was issued by Judge Jackson Brown.

      2. It has nothing to do with the merits of the case 

      3. It basically only lasts through the weekend. 

      4. The purpose is to allow the appeals court to hear it and decide it, presumably on Monday.

    20. oneseason2000 on

      Doesn’t this action by US Supreme Court Justice Brown Jackson provide an opportunity to force POTUS to distribute full SNAP payments for longer?

      „After a Boston appeals court declined to immediately intervene, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued an order late Friday pausing the requirement to distribute full SNAP payments until the appeals court rules on whether to issue a more lasting pause. Jackson handles emergency matters from Massachusetts.“

      [https://apnews.com/article/snap-food-government-shutdown-trump-a807e9f0c0a7213e203c074553dc1f9b](https://apnews.com/article/snap-food-government-shutdown-trump-a807e9f0c0a7213e203c074553dc1f9b)

    21. Ok_Use7 on

      I can’t help but feel like the money allocated for food funds has been embezzled elsewhere.

      I’m not even sure how or how that would work but I can’t help but believe ~~they’re stealing~~ they’ve stolen the money.

    24. HereWeMehAgain on

      Hold up. It was from Ketanji?

      Okay don’t everyone come for me, but honestly, doesn’t it mean there’s got to be something strategic/meaningful behind it ? Please don’t tell me she’s been compromised and my dumb ass doesn’t know it.

    26. Public_Fucking_Media on

      Each Supreme Court justice is assigned to a specific circuit or group of circuits for emergency docket matters. The assignment is based on geography, with a specific justice acting as the „circuit justice“ for the emergency applications from the courts within that circuit.

      So KBJ is making a ruling in this way that pauses it for the lower court to decide, rather than have it go to the full SCOTUS, which would take much longer.

    27. bsep4 on

      Important:
      Ketanji Brown Jackson has issued a temporary administrative stay, allowing the block of SNAP benefits while the appeals court considers Trump’s application in full. She wants an order from the First Circuit upholding the trial court. That would give the liberal minority a foothold to argue the Supreme Court should do so as well. a strategic stay to increase chance of restarting SNAP benefits.

    28. coastkid2 on

      Of course they ruled in his favor! The SC majority are his puppets and need to be impeached & removed

    29. Hereticus_Alpharius on

      Cruelty seems to be a consistent feature of Republican actions, huh.

    30. floog on

      I’m calling it now. Before he leaves office, they will give a couple of them (Alito and Thomas) millions of dollars in payoffs to step down and then Trump will offer them presidential pardons after he appoints new SC justices.

    33. UnhingedReptar on

      Democrats need to expand the court if we are ever going to have a chance at reversing this nightmare.

    34. whomad1215 on

      >Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who issued the stay, set it to expire in two days.

      For those who can’t be bothered to read past the headline.

    Leave A Reply