Richter verbietet Trump dauerhaft die Entsendung von Truppen der Nationalgarde nach Portland als Reaktion auf Einwanderungsproteste
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-permanently-bars-trump-deploying-national-guard-troops-portland-rcna236421
Richter verbietet Trump dauerhaft die Entsendung von Truppen der Nationalgarde nach Portland als Reaktion auf Einwanderungsproteste
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-permanently-bars-trump-deploying-national-guard-troops-portland-rcna236421
12 Kommentare
>The DOJ claimed that federal law enforcement needs the National Guard’s help because they’re “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”
The Trump administration can’t claim to care about the law while simultaneously ignoring judicial orders. The emperor has no clothes.
Maybe try lying to the judge again.
And if he ignores them and does it anyway, there are zero consequences for him personally.
Isn’t this like the third time it’s been “permanently” halted?
L fucking O fucking L
Oh the judge told him no. We know from at least 27 women what he thinks of that word.
His response will be a strongly worded letter, well letterS
F U
Until the Supreme Court overturns it. That’s pretty much what I expect now. The lower courts make correct and just rulings and the Supreme Court goes “to hell with being good people fuck them poor people.”
Jfc… here we are again. We’ve seen this part of the movie over and over and over.
Trump: we’re violating the Constitution
Small legal group: see you in court!
(waits a lot while Trump admin violates Constitution)
Judge: No Trump! This is illegal. You must stop.
(Trump appeals)
Path 1: Judge approves of violation = end of issue. Trump steamrolls Constitution.
Path 2:
Plaintiffs: see! This madman is breaking the Constitution.
Judge: No Trump! This is illegal. You must stop.
(Trump appeals to Supreme Court)
Plaintiffs: see! This madman is breaking the Constitution. The appeals court has already ruled. There’s no sane reason to take up the case!
Supreme Court: Bring this to us immediately!
(Hears arguments)
Supreme Court: I see. So you told our client he couldn’t do what he wants. Well, sorry, but he can.
Plaintiffs: Why?
Supreme Court: Because we said so. Don’t make us write an opinion. It gets hard trying to make this look legitimate. Better luck next time. Now, Trump… do your worst. You have our blessings, and no one can dispute that.
>Permanently
[…]
>“To be clear, today this Court does not rule that the President can never deploy the National Guard to Oregon, or to any other location, if conditions on the ground justify the Guard’s intervention,” Immergut wrote.
So she conclusively ruled that this particular justification was not strong enough and permanently barred this particular deployment on the basis of the justification they already offered, but said other deployments could proceed if they had better reasons. It’s a permanent ruling, but probably not in the way most people think of the word.
That’ll do it!
Take the L DonOLD.