Lernen Sie den Vater von Elon gf Grimes, Maurice Boucher, kennen. Er ist ein Transhumanist, der menschliche Gene bearbeiten möchte, um zu Cyborgs zu werden und ihren freien Willen und ihre Verbindung zu Gott zu verlieren. Macht das Tablet, das Grimes am 04.09.19 herausbrachte, acht Tage bevor Wuhan Lab sein Virussequenzierungslabor löschte und COVID begann, jetzt Sinn?

SS: notice the upside down pentagram on i_o mask that he posted for “Violence” 8 days before COVID hit. Grimes wore masks to in her 9/4/19 “Violence” video.

Nathan Wolfe (Rothschild-Epstein-Maxwell asset) of DARPA/EcoHealth/Gates Foundation ran the COVID-19 creation operation with Peter Daszak of EcoHealth via the Global Virome Project (Wuhan Lab). Nathan Wolfe dedicated his book “Viral Storm” to Israeli spy Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates and is BFF with Israeli spy Ghislaine Maxwell.

“Did virus hunters cover up a lab leak?” (Good article about the Global Virome Project headed by Nathan Wolfe and Peter Daszak)
https://archive.is/G8Lp8

“Hunter Biden’s Ukraine BioLab Partner (Nathan Wolfe) Was Partners With Ghislaine Maxwell”
https://archive.is/0BxQM

Documentary on Nathan Wolfe:
https://youtu.be/Q8UgtUtDDp8?si=rtVbLNeSElmDwTkz

Bill Gates 9/4/19 $55 million BioNTech mRNA vaxx creator investment: https://archive.is/IP0b9

Elon/Grimes 9/4/19 tablet: https://archive.is/s7kJT

Former EcoHealth VP Andrew Huff September 2019 DARPA weird job offer: https://twitter.com/AGHuff/status/1492249880546398215

Former EcoHealth VP Dr. Andrew Huff legal declaration confirming EcoHealth funded by Bill Gates and CIA (In-Q-Tel) and that Peter Daszak told him he was working with CIA: https://archive.is/iZL1N

“COVID-19 might have started to spread in September 2019 in the United States: study”https://archive.is/NpOqY

>On the 12th Sep 2019, the main database of samples and viral sequences of the Wuhan Institute of Virology went offline. Eventually every single of the 16 virus databases managed by the WIV was taken offline.

https://archive.is/i79eW

**Here’s former CDC director Robert Redfield under oath before the Congress on Wuhan Lab September 2019 events:**

https://www.youtube.com/live/aXXWRaM-sWQ?feature=share

>I will say if you go back and look, it’s declassified now, and I’m sure you all have your classified briefings, but the declassified information now:

>In September of 2019, three things happened in that lab, one is they deleted the sequences, that was highly irregular, researchers don’t usually like to do that

>Second thing they did was they changed the command and control of the lab from the civilian control to the military control. Highly unusual, and I’ve been involved in dual use labs when I was in the military.

>And the third thing they did which I think is really telling is they let a contractor redo the ventilation system in that laboratory. So I think clearly there was strong evidence that there was a significant event that happened in that laboratory in September. It’s now been declassified, you can read it. I’m sure there’s more classified information around it.

**Scientist Richard Ebright**

>The relevance of this is that SARS Cov-2, the pandemic virus, is the only virus in its entire genus of SARS-related coronaviruses that contains a fully functional cleavage site at the S1, S2 junction. And here is a proposal from the beginning of 2018 [from Fauci/Gates-funded EcoHealth Alliance] proposing explicitly to engineer that sequence at that position in chimeric lab- generated coronaviruses.

– Richard Ebright, an eminent molecular biologist at Rutgers University, https://archive.is/cCBUw

**Eminent Virologist David Baltimore of CalTech**

>When I first saw the furin cleavage site in the viral sequence, with its arginine codons, I said to my wife it was the smoking gun for the origin of the virus. These features make a powerful challenge to the idea of a natural origin for SARS2.

– David Baltimore, an eminent virologist and former president of CalTech, https://archive.is/yalCe

**Former CDC Director Robert Redfield:**

>I was concerned because of the presence of the furin cleavage site that we’ve talked about and I think it’s important to understand what that cleavage site does. That cleavage site totally changes the orientation of the binding domain of COVID, so where before it could not see the ACE2 receptor which is the human receptor, it totally changes the orientation now so it has high affinity for human receptors. So that furin cleavage site bothered me, it didn’t seem like it belonged there.

>And then if you look at the sequences they use in those 12 nucleotides for arginine, where the arginine sequence nucleotide triplet were coded for humans. So why did it have the arginine coding for humans and not bat? It was very disconcerting to me. It looked like this virus was engineered.

>It’s not scientifically plausible that this virus went from a bat to humans and became one of the most infectious viruses that we have for humans.

**Scientist Valentin Bruttel:**

>I tried to raise awareness to this for a year now.
WIV use BsaI and BsmBI/Esp3I sites before to make synthetic WIV1 variants.
And exactly those sites appear in a “silently introduced, perfect for synthetic assembly” pattern in SARS2, but non of its nat. relatives.

>seriously, what is the chance that exactly those type IIs restriction appear or disappear through random evolution in a Banal-20-52 like virus?
5-6 precise mutations in 30000bp?
about 1 in 10^20!
SARS2 is clearly synthetic!

**Type Ils restriction sites prove a synthetic origin**

Synthetic RNA viruses are assembled at the DNA level and later transcribed. 30,000 nucleotides cannot be synthesized in one go. These viruses are therefore assembled from smaller, 2- 8,000 nucleotide long pieces. Specific DNA restriction sites are often added to later reassemble the individual building blocks in the correct order. It is also technically possible to hide these interfaces (No See’em), but this was not done in the WIV.

In a 2017 paper, two very specific, particularly suitable type Ils restriction enzymes were used at the WIV. These have the advantage that they can produce different DNA overhangs (sticky ends), which are crucial for a correct assembly of the complete genome: Bsal and BsmBI.

SARS2 shows a Bsal and BsmBI restriction site pattern which is ideal for assembling synthetic viruses and to later replace the spike protein or furin cleavage site.

Bsal and BsmBI restriction sites also exist in closely related viruses (Banal20-52, RaTG13), but these are distributed in such a way that an artificial virus could never be generated using the methods established at WIV 2018/19.

**The probability that the required 5 synonymous mutations, which enable a synthetic assembly of SARS2, arose purely by chance is less than 1 in 10^20 or about as likely as winning the lottery jackpot 3 times in a row.**

Dr. Valentin Bruttel

https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1566365635680124929?t=koDQ9poynY6I9qSchgQAnw&s=19