[OC] Erwähnungen von "Hillary" in offiziellen (nicht Kampagnen-)E-Newslettern, im Laufe der Zeit, nach Partei
Daten und Werkzeug zum Zeichnen des Diagramms www.dcinbox.com (meine Arbeit)
Von lindseypcormack
[OC] Erwähnungen von "Hillary" in offiziellen (nicht Kampagnen-)E-Newslettern, im Laufe der Zeit, nach Partei
Daten und Werkzeug zum Zeichnen des Diagramms www.dcinbox.com (meine Arbeit)
Von lindseypcormack
12 Kommentare
[OC] Mentions of „Hillary“ in official (not campaign) e-newsletters, over time, by party
Data & tool to draw the graph at [www.dcinbox.com](http://www.dcinbox.com) (my work)
Republicans obsession with her is hilarious but the idea that the Democrats still embrace and run the Clintons out to speak on behalf of the party is so god damn annoying.
I don’t have a horse in this race, but absolute numbers don’t seem useful
Do both parties send the same number of newsletters?
Data source: someone’s arse hole
E/ this data totally passes the eye test 🍻
I’d love to see how other words like „trans“ too. My guess is that trans will show an even more exaggerated disparity
What’s the significance of this?
I’d like to point out that the current mentions of Hillary by democrats since 2023 are mostly attributed to current member Hillary Scholten, elected in 2023.
This is definitely not in good faith.
What I learned from these posts is that Democrats don’t talk about anything, ever
I think I said something similar on another one of your posts, but semantic analysis would go well with this. Knowing how much a word was used isn’t as interesting as knowing the context as to why it was used.
Come up with a few buckets categories and do an analysis to determine contextual significance.
If only we had a way to show like a line connecting these bars…
Imagine all the stuff we’re not seeing because it’s illegally going through encrypted, unofficial channels.
Next time, I would recommend taking the data and putting more work into the presentation of the data yourself before posting here. As it is, this is a really basic graph with a difficult to read x-axis because of the relatively dense amount of text. I’m also really confused as to why the columns appear to be 8 month increments. Don’t be afraid to break out GIMP and add some text to make it a fuller infographic, explaining why the data is shown the way it is. It’s also oddly low-res, and I’m not sure why such light versions of blue and red were chosen for the graph colors.
When you say it’s your work, do you mean that you also had a large hand in programming the website this is from?