Share.

    8 Kommentare

    1. Caciulacdlac on

      Finally, one US map that doesn’t look like every US statistical map ever

    2. Natural development since women have a longer expected lifespan too I guess? Probably the male-dominated states are also related to how people live (mountain and desert regions with agriculture and mining being more prevalent? I’m slightly surprised CO is above 50% though.

    3. hopelesscaribou on

      More than 40 states you mean.

      I imagine in places like North Dakota, you have men traveling there to work in areas like mining.

      It’s ironic that women are often considered a minority, when it’s the men who technically are.

    4. Weird way to say it when almost all states have more women than men except the more rugged states. Since women have a higher life expectancy, I’d expect the population in most states to trend toward women.

    5. Effective_Coach7334 on

      This is very confusing. The key at the top doesn’t use the same colors and they’re split, but none on the map are split, and all the numbers are semi-faded. And why isn’t the key a solid bar with a contiguous color grade? What does „Female More“ relate to?

    6. mauriziomonti on

      That legend isn’t very clear IMO why is it so faded? I was also confused by the „female more“ and I had to read it 2-3 times to understand it was referring to the SE area. Interesting data and the visualisation is not bad though.

    7. MrNiceguy037 on

      I think it is quite fascinating to think about the question why are there almost as many males as females on the planet. For reproduction, theoretically we need only few males who can make many females pregnant

    Leave A Reply