Behindert der indigene Titel den Zugang zu Kronland in BC?

An important through-line throughout the article, is that if you’re willing to recognize that there is a valid claim to these lands, and *negotiate in good faith* with the First Nations groups in question, you’re going to generally be able to continue using these areas as you were previously. There are *some* exceptions when it comes to the commercialization of these properties (especially around private capital interest groups like Public Land Use which conveniently ignore non-extraction uses, according to the article), which makes sense.

Frankly, I don’t see what the issues are. This is their land, and they should have a fundamental say in how it is used.