„Es geht nicht um Sicherheit, es geht um Kontrolle“ – Wie EU-Regierungen ihre eigene Kommunikation verschlüsseln wollen, aber unsere privaten Chats zerstören | TechRadar

    https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/its-not-about-security-its-about-control-how-eu-governments-want-to-encrypt-their-own-comms-but-break-our-private-chats

    Von hamstar_potato

    Share.

    9 Kommentare

    1. Basic_Alternative753 on

      This is obvious from the start. That’s why they are so desperate. Even though EU and Constitutional Courts have Pimpslapped those things down at every attempt.

    2. Common-Ad6470 on

      Explains all the CCTV and face recognition as well. The EU is adopting China’s policies on population control but trying to do it on the quiet.

    3. silentspectator27 on

      Not happening on our watch, politicians need to remember who elected them and why.

    4. Africaspaceman on

      Sí bueno, los partidos políticos financiados indirectamente por Rusia, están posicionados en contra de chatcontrol y esos suelen ser los partidos fascistas de la ultraderecha… Nada es lo que parece.

    5. North-Creative on

      Uf we would at least get Chinese tech efficiency for that lost privacy. Nope. Shitty infrastructure, and mass surveillance…

    6. AdminEating_Dragon on

      Why is the Danish government so insistent on it?

      Are the Danish so obsessed with „fighting against child porn“ or something and trust that they will never have a government with nefarious internet which will use having access to chats for other reasons?

      Sweden too, Spain and some of the other countries who support it, it’s mind-boggling.

      They obviously think it’s not *that* unpopular if they believe they can support it and get away with it.

    7. As much as people don’t want to hear this, we are not entitled to encrypted communication media if our inflated sense of privacy leads to an increase in crime. I am referring to people trafficking, child trafficking, drug smuggling, illicit weapon dealing, images and videos of extreme violence, pedophilia and similar material. The irony is inescapable – on the one hand we expect our governments and associated law enforcement agencies to protect us from terrorist threats and to do their best to keep us safe, but we then believe our right to communicate with others, using encrypted media is greater than that of our safety. I accept that there is a need for encrypted communication when those using it are living in countries where oppressive regimes are in control.

    Leave A Reply