Share.

    26 Kommentare

    1. Alwaystired254 on

      Wow, glad that got cleared up. If they break the law they can be arrested. Ground breaking

    2. >The decision issued October 7 by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings extends court oversight of the agency until February 2, 2026, and warns that officers who disregard the order could face contempt or criminal referral.

      That would be something useful if the previous paragraph had *not* said:

      >A federal court in Chicago has ordered sweeping new limits on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in the Midwest, ruling that agents repeatedly violated federal law and a binding consent decree by arresting people without warrants.

      Hey Judge Cummings, you *just* said they *already* violated the law *and* a consent decree *repeatedly*. So, *issue* those contempt or criminal referrals. Less brow-furrowing, more action.

    3. faith_apnea on

      Duh. They’re citizens and subject to the law of the land. Otherwise they’d be deported, right?

    4. DelightfulAbsurdity on

      Wouldn’t it be hilarious if nationwide police reform started by ejecting cops who help ICE?

    5. Perhaps you should appropriate an ICE detention facility and keep them in there until their trials… if they ever get any.

    6. Three_Froggy_Problem on

      So the question is, are cops going to do anything about it? Even if the police weren’t clearly on ICE’s side anyway, I think it would take *a lot* for the average cop to determine that a federally deployed agent is breaking the law and not just acting within the parameters of their job.

      At any rate, I guess this is something? But I feel like Pritzker needs to make it very explicit that the police’s duty is to Illinois citizens and not to ICE.

    7. kalkutta2much on

      first you’re going to have to convince me ice and cops are different entities serving different purposes. otherwise we can skip right to “we investigated ourselves and found we had done nothing wrong”

      can’t spell police without ice!!

    8. That very photo is more or less a crime. 40 mm even with riot munitions is lethal at that range, threatening with one for a non-violent crime is not the sort of stuff allowed in a civilized country. Just a year ago, that guy has to answer for this — he probably gets paid suspension, not jail, but still today it’s just one of a thousand violations a day.

    9. Bigchunky_Boy on

      Trump private army is stock piling weapons. ( chemical and other according to the Daily Beast) they are starting civilian war .
      End this nonsense now and remove him from office .
      Putin loves this mess and is helping him .

    10. It won’t happen and any cop that does will immediately face federal charges for impeding federal agents & kidnapping them plus it will give Trump the ability to go full insurrection act and have the military arresting those Portland cops that aren’t enforcing the law when antifa gets violent.

    11. RutabagaOutside6126 on

      Start locking them up in state prison. Then when the feds arrest another politician use the captured ice agents as a bargaining chip. The feds want to act like they are at war with the states, let’s start doing the same to them.

    12. Due-Resort-2699 on

      So what happens when a local police force attempts an arrest and ICE aim their weapons at them?

    13. I’ve got $20 that says the number of ICE agents that are arrested will remain at zero. There is not a single cop that is going to be willing to pull that (literal or figurative) trigger to make the first move. And until they do, ICE will act with impunity and dare them to do something about it.

      And if they do, either the rest of the cops are going to stand down, or all fucking hell is going to break loose.

    Leave A Reply