Die BBC habe einen „schwerwiegenden Verstoß“ gegen die Rundfunkregeln begangen, indem sie nicht offengelegt habe, dass der Erzähler einer Dokumentation über Gaza der Sohn eines Hamas-Funktionärs sei
Die BBC habe einen „schwerwiegenden Verstoß“ gegen die Rundfunkregeln begangen, indem sie nicht offengelegt habe, dass der Erzähler einer Dokumentation über Gaza der Sohn eines Hamas-Funktionärs sei
This is the documentary that was translating „Jews“ as „Israelis“
Edit: added quotes and sources
>Criticism continued about the programme’s subtitling choices – including contributors using the Arabic word for „Jews“ on camera, which was translated in the subtitles as „Israelis“ or „Israeli army“.
>on at least five occasions the words Yahud or Yahudy – Arabic for “Jew” or “Jews” – were changed to “Israel” or “Israeli forces”, or were removed from the subtitles altogether.
BBC broadcasted with an Israeli bias for almost the entire conflict and now they pull this?
Zardoz_Wearing_Pants on
Hey! Go easy on the person that did this, they’re so used to getting away with right wing propaganda that they forgot about the rules.
(well, I guess it’s ‚you are‘, not they’re…)
Dockers4flag2035orB4 on
At least the BBC can admit it’s wrong.
Hopefully all credible media companies will learn from this.
(Or am I being naive?)
west_tn_guy on
I think this quote describes a lot of BBC reporting I’ve observed…“a significant failing in relation to accuracy“…..although this describes most main stream media these days.
free2ski on
BBC has the same amount of journalistic integrity as trump has respect for the law and ethics. Little to none.
Adventurous-Wall-122 on
What will be the penalty of this blunder?
Greekgeek2000 on
To the surprise of absolutely NOONE
Scamandrius on
I find it funny how they mention a „potential to erode trust“ when every single human who’s read them knows where they stand on it.
jojoblogs on
The Israel derangement syndrome boggles my mind still.
Why are so many historically respected institutions suddenly incapable of being unbiased when it comes to this conflict?
Minute_University_98 on
Whoa, wait?
People still watch the BBC expecting non bias and facts?
How quaint.
IJustLovePenguinsOk on
*Quelle surprise*
loginisverybroken on
BBC cutting unrepentant h-mas propaganda is not a surprise. Their coverage has been a disgrace
biggessdickess on
Can we be clear what is meant by „Hamas official“? What was his role/job in the organisation called Hamas? Member? Central committee? Military committee? If he was a mere civil servant, in an administration governed by Hamas, in what area was he working? Hamas teacher? Hamas doctor? Hamas department of roads and traffic?
We wouldn’t refer to just any Israeli civil servant as a „Likud official“, for example. Likud doctor, etc.
sovietarmyfan on
They are literally putting reasons for more media control on a silver plate and giving it to governments.
I won’t cry about it if the government wants to regulate the BBC more because of this very reason.
yosisoy on
What will be the consequences?
whiteb8917 on
HAH, and you guys have to pay a Tv License to fund this shit.
kaytin911 on
Everyone needs to get through their heads that no news source is completely trustworthy.
BlackOverlordd on
I’m sick and tired of this disgusting propaganda machine trying to excuse terrorist bullshit at every opportunity. Are they on Iranian government payroll?
DarkTwistxo on
and nothing will happen, nothing will change. The BBCnews hold the license payers in contempt, they just don’t care.
Bananern on
I’m not Brittish, but every time I hear about the BBC it seems like they’re acting like an unironic propaganda platform
Malynde on
BBC pushing Islam propaganda, how suprising from a Islamic nation of UK
irving47 on
If they work for the BBC it should have been an easy deduction.
MJamal111 on
yhyh we get it israel are the most moral army killing and raping women and children on mass and hamas is the real monster
KebabsMate on
I would support the BBC, if it wasn’t for this HUGE oversight.
Oh and that small thing that they protected a pedophile and covered everything up when they found out about it. Just like the GOP and Epstein is doing right this second.
Fuck the BBC. You are a fucking completely untrustworthy rag that only survives due to the forced monthly subscription you try to enforce by law.
Big_Highway_939 on
Hamas’s deputy minister of agriculture…
reebee7 on
Well I’d never.
OkCheesecake9485 on
loooooooooooool
myrcenator on
Typical BBC.
braiam on
I knew this was familiar. This is the same news [from February](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c07zz5937llo), [then July](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cn7dpvee4gkt) rehashed again for maximum impact. The conclusion that readers reached at the time was that 1) yes, BBC could do better, but 2) who the heck is going to narrate about Gaza without being afraid of saying the wrong thing because 3) Hamas is a threat to anyone living in Gaza.
BTW, the narrator is just the son of a minister of agriculture, not a member of Hamas itself.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
30 Kommentare
This is the documentary that was translating „Jews“ as „Israelis“
Edit: added quotes and sources
>Criticism continued about the programme’s subtitling choices – including contributors using the Arabic word for „Jews“ on camera, which was translated in the subtitles as „Israelis“ or „Israeli army“.
[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2d4egk17l2o](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2d4egk17l2o)
>on at least five occasions the words Yahud or Yahudy – Arabic for “Jew” or “Jews” – were changed to “Israel” or “Israeli forces”, or were removed from the subtitles altogether.
[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/25/bbc-whitewashed-anti-semitism-gaza-documentary/](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/25/bbc-whitewashed-anti-semitism-gaza-documentary/)
Non-paywalled link: [https://archive.fo/jwZfi](https://archive.fo/jwZfi)
BBC broadcasted with an Israeli bias for almost the entire conflict and now they pull this?
Hey! Go easy on the person that did this, they’re so used to getting away with right wing propaganda that they forgot about the rules.
(well, I guess it’s ‚you are‘, not they’re…)
At least the BBC can admit it’s wrong.
Hopefully all credible media companies will learn from this.
(Or am I being naive?)
I think this quote describes a lot of BBC reporting I’ve observed…“a significant failing in relation to accuracy“…..although this describes most main stream media these days.
BBC has the same amount of journalistic integrity as trump has respect for the law and ethics. Little to none.
What will be the penalty of this blunder?
To the surprise of absolutely NOONE
I find it funny how they mention a „potential to erode trust“ when every single human who’s read them knows where they stand on it.
The Israel derangement syndrome boggles my mind still.
Why are so many historically respected institutions suddenly incapable of being unbiased when it comes to this conflict?
Whoa, wait?
People still watch the BBC expecting non bias and facts?
How quaint.
*Quelle surprise*
BBC cutting unrepentant h-mas propaganda is not a surprise. Their coverage has been a disgrace
Can we be clear what is meant by „Hamas official“? What was his role/job in the organisation called Hamas? Member? Central committee? Military committee? If he was a mere civil servant, in an administration governed by Hamas, in what area was he working? Hamas teacher? Hamas doctor? Hamas department of roads and traffic?
We wouldn’t refer to just any Israeli civil servant as a „Likud official“, for example. Likud doctor, etc.
They are literally putting reasons for more media control on a silver plate and giving it to governments.
I won’t cry about it if the government wants to regulate the BBC more because of this very reason.
What will be the consequences?
HAH, and you guys have to pay a Tv License to fund this shit.
Everyone needs to get through their heads that no news source is completely trustworthy.
I’m sick and tired of this disgusting propaganda machine trying to excuse terrorist bullshit at every opportunity. Are they on Iranian government payroll?
and nothing will happen, nothing will change. The BBCnews hold the license payers in contempt, they just don’t care.
I’m not Brittish, but every time I hear about the BBC it seems like they’re acting like an unironic propaganda platform
BBC pushing Islam propaganda, how suprising from a Islamic nation of UK
If they work for the BBC it should have been an easy deduction.
yhyh we get it israel are the most moral army killing and raping women and children on mass and hamas is the real monster
I would support the BBC, if it wasn’t for this HUGE oversight.
Oh and that small thing that they protected a pedophile and covered everything up when they found out about it. Just like the GOP and Epstein is doing right this second.
Fuck the BBC. You are a fucking completely untrustworthy rag that only survives due to the forced monthly subscription you try to enforce by law.
Hamas’s deputy minister of agriculture…
Well I’d never.
loooooooooooool
Typical BBC.
I knew this was familiar. This is the same news [from February](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c07zz5937llo), [then July](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cn7dpvee4gkt) rehashed again for maximum impact. The conclusion that readers reached at the time was that 1) yes, BBC could do better, but 2) who the heck is going to narrate about Gaza without being afraid of saying the wrong thing because 3) Hamas is a threat to anyone living in Gaza.
BTW, the narrator is just the son of a minister of agriculture, not a member of Hamas itself.