Sprecher des US-Repräsentantenhauses bezeichnet Nacktradtour in Portland als „das Bedrohlichste, was ich je gesehen habe“
https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2025/10/us-house-speaker-calls-portland-naked-bike-ride-most-threatening-thing-ive-seen-yet.html
37 Kommentare
Yes, now he has to tell his son that he saw naked people.
Oh no! Naked people!! the horror.
threatening to give him an uncomfortable boner?
„The size of those penises… something’s hot right… I mean NOT right!“
Stupid sexy bike riders!
I watched a video of masked thugs pointing guns at a lady for recording them. That seemed a whole lot more threatening than a bunch of naked Portlandians riding bikes. Of course, those masked thugs worked for the federal government.
Keep it up. These protests are making these fascists look absolutely pathetic.
That will continue this weekend at No Kings.
“We have such sights to show you.” 😱🚲
Gee I wonder what he would think about the naked Adam and Eve in the Bible.
Oh no, the sandwich thrower and now naked people.
What about a few thousand people storming the Capitol building, Mike? Wasn’t that a little scarier than naked bike riders? These people SMH
Maybe someone could tell him that naked bike rides are [a worldwide event](https://wiki.worldnakedbikeride.org/wiki/List_of_rides), drawing hundreds of thousands of riders and there’s nothing threatening or sleazy about them. They’re heaps of fun for both participants and spectators, and if they can serve a dual purpose as a protest, that’s even better.
I fear people brave enough to cycle naked and I’m glad they’re on our side.
Road rash!!
A bunch of bicyclers more threatening than Charlie Kirk getting popped on livestream?
[removed]
You know all the franks and beans stirred something in him.
He got aroused by naked men. Got it.
On the one hand, yes this is a ridiculous story on its face. On the other hand, though, it’s also another instance of MAGA telling on themselves that they’re an authoritarian, reactionary movement. Doesn’t matter if it’s naked bike rides, wearing goofy costumes, merely protesting at all, or even just advocating for opposing policies. Disagreeing with MAGA ideology in any way is seen by them as a „threat“ because they know their ideology is unpopular, and the only way they can make it the „majority“ is through force.
It’s ridiculous, but it also shows how dangerous reactionaries can be once they decide to seize power. *Any* disagreement or opposition is a „threat“, and that’s how they’ll treat it, rather than a difference in political preference.
Just a reminder to the voters of Louisiana, you have the ability to recall elected Officials. It would only take 40% of voters to start the process.
[https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?d=81315](https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?d=81315)
[https://www.sos.la.gov/ElectionsAndVoting/FindPublicOfficials/RecallAnElectedOfficial/Pages/default.aspx](https://www.sos.la.gov/ElectionsAndVoting/FindPublicOfficials/RecallAnElectedOfficial/Pages/default.aspx)
As he bit his bottom lip and wiped the sweat from his brow.
I saw that ICE shot a woman 5 times and then lied about it and was caught by their own bodycam video. I’d say that was more threatening.
The *sole* value of conservatism is respect for and obedience to [one’s perception of] traditionally established hierarchy, and hierarchy dictates that those on top (in-groups) are rightfully idolized and receive privileges, credibility, and resources, while those on the bottom (out-groups) are demonized/dehumanized and/or bound by restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources.
To them, the second-greatest injustice imaginable is for those [they perceive to be] on the bottom [of social hierarchy] to have access to the rights, credibility, and resources reserved for those on top. The first greatest injustice is for those on top to be bound by the restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources reserved for those on the bottom.
Conservatives absolutely need an underclass [for society] to demonize and dehumanize in order to maintain [their] hierarchy, and every single one of their policies and rhetoric work to do exactly that. „Know your place“ is their mantra.
He probably got aroused.
Can’t have that. The lord does not permit it.
bewbs ARE literal violence!!!!
butts are literal genocide!!!
Anyway, am i the only one who thinks it’s a bit sus that the same people who crash Grindr every time they have a convention are so freaked out by naked humans?
Mike Johnson is as afraid of pussy as a Catholic priest.
You don’t get to bring up crime when your leader is a convicted felon.
All those pee pees are making him feel gay…as the devil intended! 🤡
What a jackass.
This is a guy who has such an issue keeping his urges under control he makes sure his porn usage is monitored by his son…so this checks out.
So they’ve been lying about Portland being war-ravaged?
The most threatening they’ve seen is some naked people on bikes?
I’m really F’n tired of my country being this prudish.
We bomb children and call it collateral damage. That’s appalling.
These are some tits and dicks. If they were covered in fur you’d spend 100$ to see them in a zoo with your kids.
Johnson: they were armed
Me: they were naked, do you mean they had arms?
Johnson:
Me: Johnson is a synonym for dick
>“Most recently,” Johnson went on, “the most threatening thing I’ve seen yet was the naked bicyclers in Portland who were protesting ICE down there. I mean, it’s getting really ugly.”
The speaker of the house is a sick fucking compromised, complicit, fascist joke.
America. Where boobs and naked butts are more offensive than guns.
So, he admits that protests from the left are not violent.
Lmao! His son is the worst porn blocker
They are naked. Literally unarmed. Unless you think they are all karate masters or one has a threatening meat sword, fuck off. God, this makes him look so weak and pathetic.
so many dicks and Mike Johnson wasn’t there to suckle!
Hey, Mike. State’s Rights!
Public nudity is legal in Oregon so long as you do not have the intent to arouse others. That would be highly improper.