Habe gerade darüber gelesen "Phantomzeit-Hypothese." Die Theorie, dass die Jahre 614-911 n. Chr. vollständig erfunden waren. Sie machten buchstäblich nur 300 Jahre aus. Warum? Was wollten sie vertuschen?

    Es bedeutet, dass unsere gesamte Zeitleiste eine Lüge sein könnte. Wir könnten nach der Apokalypse in der wiederaufgebauten Version leben, ohne es zu wissen …

    Von Friendly-Seesaw-5742

    Share.

    43 Kommentare

    1. Sweaty-Two-2984 on

      Last I heard they added 1000 years.  Some old graves and buildings have their date start with a J and not a 1.  Eg. J700 is not 1700 but 700 yeas after Christ.  So the year is actually 1025. The mud flooded buildings were here during christs time. 

    2. RecordingTop6318 on

      i love conspiracy theories but this has been debunked so many times

    3. incompletetentperson on

      i mean realistically, there could have been „advanced“ civilizations here multiple times that have been wiped out either partially or entirely by some sort of cataclysm multiple times. we would never know.

    4. itsFauxProphete on

      More like 700-1000 years – lots of people have done work on this like here: [https://youtu.be/xHcvznRMNVk?si=y4B8rT2__Ed6No-4](https://youtu.be/xHcvznRMNVk?si=y4B8rT2__Ed6No-4)

      The deeper you get the more it seems like the missing millennia is actually the Millennial Reign of the Saints that was prophesized in Revelations. Jesus already came and went.. tribulations already happened and the Dark Ages was actually a time of Light while the enlightenment was the loosing of Satan and his ilk bringing back the „progress“ of technology to our world.

    5. It’s more like 900 years, and it was a removal of gnosticism amongst other illegal knowledge.

      Jesus was a growing trend of people, following Plato’s Demiurge; that the world was a false construction built by a machine.

      They hid knowledge that the world was built by AI and rendered it illegal by the 4th century, burning monasteries and killing priests that supported it.

    6. Double_Today_289 on

      I want proof. Not circumstantial evidence. Some thesis or investigation into this. There are plenty of buildings made during the timeframe claimed to be made up (Aachen Cathedral, the city of Baghdad, etc).

    7. EUGsk8rBoi42p on

      Does this line up with the Ethiopian calendar or something?

      There are quite a few calendars active besides the Gregorian one.

    8. aeonrevolution on

      This feels more like severe mental illness and a detachment from reality.

    9. BodyLong1572 on

      They didn’t want to cover anything up. The romans just wanted to be the ones to rule the year 1000

    10. grouchoscar91 on

      I think I heard it was 1000 years that are not counted for and I think it had to do with religion dnt quite remember but have heard about years been deleted

    11. If that’s the only thing that’s missing from our history I would be surprised.

    12. Heeey_Hermano on

      I’ve seen this pretty thoroughly debunked. While Europe was in the dark ages (war/lost record keeping/rewriting history), the rest of the world wasn’t the same. Many places were actually experiencing prosperity. Places like China have an accurate account of the time. Furthermore carbon dating can fairly accurately date some items further back that don’t account for 300 years being deleted from history. I can’t remember exactly how but I believe they used dendrochronology (study of tree rings) to date certain historical timelines. The spacing of the rings over things like the little ice age were accurately recording weather patterns over centuries.

    13. RichardStaschy on

      Lol… meanwhile Egypt has deleted +10,000 years of their history. Especially, when Pharoahs didn’t like other Pharoahs in the past.

    14. Falls in the Dark Ages timeline, so id say anything is possible with absolute power like that.

    15. sad_brown_cat on

      >They literally just made up 300 years. Why? What were they trying to cover up?

      What do you mean why? The guy that created the theory literally gives the **exact** reason why. Have you bothered to do ANY research on this hypothesis before accepting it at face value and using it to question the official narrative?

      German historian Heribert Illig proposed that the Roman emperor Otto III had fabricated time to place his rule into the year 1000 A.D. which had religious significance and legitimized his rule.

      There was basically zero actual evidence for this and it was refuted by every reputable historian, and historical records from many other cultures corroborate that time period existing.

    16. History itself doesn’t exist we live in a simulation that can change from moment to moment.

    17. almondreaper on

      They literally erased the tartarian empire. Which imo is the most recent deletion. The great wall of china was actually the great wall of tartaria to keep the chinese OUT

    18. LizziePinch on

      JD Vance is on the board of the Smithsonian…they made sure of that. They are all in on it – they know exactly what this earth is about. The Smithsonian and the Vatican have all of our „receipts.“ Dragon bones, giant bones, endless sifts through so many resets. Believe me, this is just how this planet is.

    19. OsmanFetish on

      it’s not that it disappeared, we somehow moved on from one time stream to another , Phillip K, and the Doctor G, and many others spoke about our timeline somehow having been split by some external actors , but exactly what happened , no one can know by conventional means

      maybe the hadron collider really did do a number in the past , changing the future

    20. I mean, events that happened a few years ago have been memory holed or rewritten. I’d question how much of „history“ is true or accurate.

    21. Glad-Cat-1885 on

      This is why you don’t only read one hypothesis and draw a conclusion from it

    22. Stock_Step_7543 on

      Check the list of popes. All attested to. An unbroken line of 2000 years.

    23. Wooden-Teaching-8343 on

      This is one of the dumber conspiracies. Who conquered/christianized Central Europe if not Carolus Magnus? Does the treaty of Verdun splitting his empire, providing some of the earliest French and German texts, not exist? Did Mohammed not exist? What evidence has so thoroughly compelled you?

    24. inkandpaperguy on

      The Why Files did a really good episode about this specific issue. They made a great case for this to have occurred. Details elude me right now but it’s worth another watch.

    25. Lots of lost civilizations:

      Tartaria (1300 to 1850 empire + refugees until 1915)

      Pumapunku (6th century)

      Nan-Mandal (1st century to 1600s)

      Hyperborea (Some time before 1000BC)

      Troy (1200BC)

      Mohenjo-daro (2500BC)

      Cucuteni–Trypillia (4500BC to 3500BC)

      [Doggerland](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doggerland) (10,000BC to 6000BC)

      Atlantis (12,000BC)

      Lemuria (25,000BC)

    26. PepeThePepper on

      Why are people so dead set that Europe and the Middle East is the EVERYTHING of the world???

      When these guys were in their dark ages THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WORLD was probably just having a good time and vibing. Like bro there was a whole other continent out there with advanced civilizations and religions.

    27. LiveCommunication726 on

      More than that cuz, meditate through your heart, dont be racist… the truth will come to you

    28. the phantom time hypothesis is one of the most easily debunked conspiracy theories of all time and the creator of it is a pseudo historian with a track record of making a bunch of other looney claims. as for the possibility of prehuman advanced civilizations, we would have discovered some trace effects from their civilizations when taking other geological samples. we can measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere going back billions of years, we would surely have seen some evidence of industrialization or other marks of an advanced civilization. you guys should do more research into what makes a theory credible instead of spouting easily debunked and ridiculous crack pot theories

    Leave A Reply