He’s guilty, it’s not even a contest, he willfully refused without lawful excuse. The only question he can ask is was it a proper use of terror legislation or not.
TheLyam on
Of course Musk would be funding it, funding hate is what he does.
robhaswell on
I absolutely despise this law but as I understand it, it’s pretty black-and-white and he should be convicted like any normal person would be.
judochop1 on
Then he can’t complain if he is found guilty. Hard to see them getting a conviction, it was quite suspicious but would it meet the threshold for terrorism as per the act?
Luficer_Morning_star on
Honestly, this was not a good use of anti-terror law. Remember under this law you lose your right to legal defene and you MUST answer all their questions and give up your pins.
I do not think for a second they have or had any credible information to suggest he was part of an active terror group or planning an attack etc. They intrusive powers have their place when needed but I think this was an overeach of power.
Remember also, base this on the use of the powers not on who they were used against.
FuzzBuket on
I love how a handful of the turbo rich can just do whatever they want with our country. Whether it’s Rowling,musk or Dyson. Just outspend the govt on whatever they want.
Back to feudalism but I can’t even sign up to go on a fun bit of questing to find the holy grail or whatever.
merryman1 on
Why is it always nice terms like „anti-Islamist activist“ Tommy Robinson and not… idk… „Nonce defender“ Stephen Yaxley-Lennon?
Agreeable_Falcon1044 on
Maybe we can get musk to fund all his future criminal cases too. It could be the biggest source of wealth redistribution in the history of uk
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
8 Kommentare
He’s guilty, it’s not even a contest, he willfully refused without lawful excuse. The only question he can ask is was it a proper use of terror legislation or not.
Of course Musk would be funding it, funding hate is what he does.
I absolutely despise this law but as I understand it, it’s pretty black-and-white and he should be convicted like any normal person would be.
Then he can’t complain if he is found guilty. Hard to see them getting a conviction, it was quite suspicious but would it meet the threshold for terrorism as per the act?
Honestly, this was not a good use of anti-terror law. Remember under this law you lose your right to legal defene and you MUST answer all their questions and give up your pins.
I do not think for a second they have or had any credible information to suggest he was part of an active terror group or planning an attack etc. They intrusive powers have their place when needed but I think this was an overeach of power.
Remember also, base this on the use of the powers not on who they were used against.
I love how a handful of the turbo rich can just do whatever they want with our country. Whether it’s Rowling,musk or Dyson. Just outspend the govt on whatever they want.
Back to feudalism but I can’t even sign up to go on a fun bit of questing to find the holy grail or whatever.
Why is it always nice terms like „anti-Islamist activist“ Tommy Robinson and not… idk… „Nonce defender“ Stephen Yaxley-Lennon?
Maybe we can get musk to fund all his future criminal cases too. It could be the biggest source of wealth redistribution in the history of uk