Carney schließt eine neue Pipeline nach BC und die Aufhebung des Tankerverbots und der Emissionsobergrenze nicht aus
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/carney-doesnt-rule-out-new-pipeline-to-bc-repealing-tanker-ban-and-emissions-cap/
Carney schließt eine neue Pipeline nach BC und die Aufhebung des Tankerverbots und der Emissionsobergrenze nicht aus
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/carney-doesnt-rule-out-new-pipeline-to-bc-repealing-tanker-ban-and-emissions-cap/
4 Kommentare
Carney is sure talking the talk with the way he said he would act after getting elected. If he can actually make some pipelines materialize he is going to end up swaying a lot of voters in Alberta come next election (myself included). They drastically increased their vote share in Edmonton/Calgary last election, while I wasn’t one of those people I’m pretty damn close now.
Let’s see if he can walk the walk and make some projects actually happen.
I like the way the Libs are handling this.
Carney says it’s possible.
The Minister says ’not without BC’s approval‘.
Leaving the ball firmly in Alberta’s court to get their Premier to pull her head out of her ass to negotiate with BC and not be such an antagonistic wanker all the time.
Seems like a nothing story considering that Carney embeds several poison pills in his answer.
> “Those projects have several characteristics. Material, economic benefits, linking together different parts of our economy. Consistency with our climate objectives and benefits and participation for Indigenous peoples. So those elements coming together can come together in a pipeline to the West Coast.”
Would a bitumen pipeline be consistent with our climate objectives? No.
Would a bitumen pipeline get participation for Indigenous peoples? Certainly not on the coast.
The framework that Carney puts forward is one that a bitumen pipeline simply cannot pass.
This is why an exasperated Eby keeps pointing back to the slate of LNG projects as being “real” since they can check off these points.
CTV in the usual backbreaking stretch to turn statements that have no mention of either the emissions cap or tanker ban into the headline we see today.
It works on the intended audience.