Share.

    3 Kommentare

    1. foundoutimanadult on

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but right now it’s not *if* we can detect many diseases with AI tools, it’s that they often *over* diagnose and there are many false positives in their testing.

      Edit: Please someone with the time check me on this as it may be a dated comment to make with all the sudden AI/ML changes.

    2. I would imagine that a better benchmark is whether they outperform human pathologists, not existing models.

    3. BuildwithVignesh on

      If it really holds up in wider trials, that’s a huge step for early cancer detection. AI in diagnostics is moving faster than anyone expected.

    Leave A Reply