Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. should just give him the sentences of the 4 other people on top, that might motivate him

    2. Personal_Lab_484 on

      Cool. Lack of guilt and reform is evident. Full sentence to be served no parole.

      Cheers mate!

    3. joeschmoagogo on

      Covering for the others is a brave move when you’re asking to be let out. Rot in prison.

    4. NathanDavie on

      It’s one of many indictments on our justice system that we know who murdered Stephen and couldn’t put more than two in jail.

    5. I mean, if has answers for Stephen’s family but is refusing to give them, I’m not sure how much sympathy I have.

      Obviously the families of the accomplices shouldn’t fear threats or anything like that, but surely that would be taken care of.

    6. WearMoreHats on

      > He denied wanting to protect the other killers but said he and his family would be „at risk“ if he gave details about the others responsible for Stephen’s murder.

      Wow, they sound like a really bad bunch if 30 years later they’re still so dangerous that you won’t name them. It’s a real shame that someone’s refusal to cooperate has put the public at risk from these people for the past 30 years.

    Leave A Reply