Share.

    13 Kommentare

    1. Saucepanmagician on

      This is very convincing. A camera-gun is an ingenious idea. Very plausible.

    2. Remarkable_Custard on

      No it doesn’t. Come on, you’re looking at actual video evidence that shows it wasn’t it at all, lol.

      His body language is not what you’d expect from a bullet coming from the back right side of you.

      His movements go backwards as in shot from the front / front left.

      Furthermore the calibar of bullet based on that impact isn’t a pea shooter coming from a camera, and the camera makes no noise, or push back, or any body language of shooting, etc.

      They all move back and run away like everyone else.

      I’m all for conspiracy, but this video shows me it was not the camera man lol.

    3. It is a „radical left“ and there is nothing to do about it. Bow to the beast.

    4. pc_principal_88 on

      As another person has already mentioned,I almost NEVER click on things like this, but I did with this video and WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?!? Also, not that I’m an expert, but she has all the trademarks of CIA redrum-ing someone,such as none of the “facts” adding up…

    5. Question why kill charlie kirk? What was he doing or saying that they found to be disruptive? I believe they did it for the attention. MAGA grew 10x stronger that day.

    6. spgreenwood on

      The way he walks backward, calm and collected is perhaps the most damning piece of evidence here. Good catch.

    Leave A Reply