Share.

    22 Kommentare

    1. PeterNoTail on

      Interesting. May not be true, but who knows at this point. Not aliens, not a comet but dark matter or a big-ass molecule from the Big Bang-era? Did i read that right? Anyway, posts like this are why i joined this sub

    2. IRISH81OUTLAWZ on

      This may be a dumb question, but at that distance how can they tell that it’s CO2 emissions from a propulsion engine that’s creating the “tail” and not just assume it’s a natural tail like we see on other star/comets/meteors in space?

      Edit: is it because it says the color and intensity doesn’t change? Suggesting that it’s a steady flow of heat rather than something that fluctuates naturally? This stuff interests me, but sometimes I get lost in the details.

    3. I like it. Fascinating if true. When is it supposed to be here and is it heading for earth?

    4. The meeting with the generals plus big meeting at copenhegan is related to this

    5. No-Bass-9844 on

      Rapture cover up One world government global unity imagine all the people living for today no heaven no hell no borders. No belief in God.

    6. MortgageDizzy9193 on

      Would be nice if they actually included measurements sand heat calculations that they claim. E_in – Eout = deltaE of system, taking into account flux of solar irradiation at the distance. All I see is a plot of velocities shared by agencies. Just a major „trust me bro, I, anonymous, I’m a ESA PhD researcher. Things are weird.“

    7. I don’t think anyone who is seriously trying to leak legit information is going to use a platform like this known for larpers trying to get attention.

    8. NaturalBornRebel on

      If this is true than it further proves we are in a simulator and the code can be changed for certain objects at will.

    9. “The object 3I/ATLAS exhibits behavior that violates known physics and doesn’t behave like any natural comet, asteroid, or interstellar object. The posts argue that:
      1. Its trajectory is too precise to be random.
      2. It absorbs heat without reacting like it should—no outgassing, no melting—despite absorbing massive amounts of solar energy.
      3. It doesn’t rotate, pulse, or change brightness like all other known celestial bodies.
      4. Its composition is bizarre, shedding “dust” that isn’t like any natural material—suggested to be synthetic, smoke-like, and manufactured.
      5. The gases it’s emitting don’t match what you’d expect—no water vapor, for example—and seem chemically anomalous.

      💥 Theory Presented:

      The object is proposed to be a Q-ball:
      • A macroscopic quantum object, a relic left over from the Big Bang.
      • It generates its own power through internal decay rather than by reflecting sunlight or radiating heat like a star.
      • Its behavior can only be explained through a new kind of physics, not yet understood.
      • It is not debris—it’s described as a deliberate, structured object with a trajectory that ensures a close pass to Earth.”

    10. MutantLeader on

      Big bang? Hah.

      Revelation 18:21 (CSB) Then a mighty angel picked up a stone like a large millstone and threw it into the sea, saying, In this way, Babylon the great city will be thrown down violently and never be found again.

    11. Warm_Iron_273 on

      Lol. This is nothing more than edited AI drivel. Sorry fella, but editing the commas away isn’t going to remove the obvious AI-ness.

    12. Brraaapppppp on

      The thing is going to be on the opposite side of the sun from us when it goes through the system . If it was any kind of intelligent species why would it do that ?

    Leave A Reply