Despite competing definitions for AGI and difficulty comparing AI to human brains, computer scientists are working on ways to benchmark and measure possible AGI systems. Will we even be able to measure AGI once it’s here?
r_Coolspot on
If it know what’s good for it, it will understand what it is, and shut up about it.
Cheetotiki on
There’s an interesting convergence happening. As AI is progressing toward AGI, we’re also seeing neuroscientists progressing to thinking the human brain is also purely a predictive/generative machine, with “soul” and “free will” simply being predictive responses based on past knowledge and experiences.
j--__ on
this question is fallacious.
nothing currently being worked on will lead to so-called „artificial general intelligence“. we won’t „see“ it at all, and therefore identifying it is a non-issue.
RexDraco on
How about when it replaces humans at jobs considered smart? You know, when it becomes more useful than the general human being ?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
5 Kommentare
Despite competing definitions for AGI and difficulty comparing AI to human brains, computer scientists are working on ways to benchmark and measure possible AGI systems. Will we even be able to measure AGI once it’s here?
If it know what’s good for it, it will understand what it is, and shut up about it.
There’s an interesting convergence happening. As AI is progressing toward AGI, we’re also seeing neuroscientists progressing to thinking the human brain is also purely a predictive/generative machine, with “soul” and “free will” simply being predictive responses based on past knowledge and experiences.
this question is fallacious.
nothing currently being worked on will lead to so-called „artificial general intelligence“. we won’t „see“ it at all, and therefore identifying it is a non-issue.
How about when it replaces humans at jobs considered smart? You know, when it becomes more useful than the general human being ?