Aussagen der Beamten der Justizabteilung zu Luigi Mangione haben Gerichtsregeln gebrochen, sagt Richter, sagt Richter

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/justice-dept-officials-statements-luigi-mangione-broke-court-rules-judge-says-2025-09-24/

    Share.

    34 Kommentare

    1. Oh man… If he gets the case dismissed because this administration is too stupid to actually be able to not fuck up court cases, I’ll laugh for days.

    2. I would say throw it on the pile but the pile is way too tall for that.

      You are going to need specialized equipment to get it up there.

      Like a balloon or some sort of aircraft.

    3. Time-Painting-9108 on

      IN THE SPAN OF 4 DAYS:

      1) president going on TV saying LM shot the CEO in the back. No alleged or anything. Already declared guilty. 

      2) Two high ranking staff in the AG and Deputy AG office reposting Trump’s interview saying he is right and AG Pam Bondi should pursue the death penalty 

      3) White House Press Sec blaming LM for inciting leftist violence and posting a memo on the website linking him to antifa (what?!? Anyone with half a brain knows Luigi wasn’t a radical leftist) 

      4) Stephen Miller doubling down what was said above in an interview the next day 

      And this is after Pam Bondi when in Instagram and Fox News in April before he was indicted. There was ALREADY a warning from the judge.
      They are TERRIFIED of the public support for Luigi. They know he is not a radical leftist, but they are putting him into that narrative. His right to a fair trial has been compromised. 

    4. obligatorythr0waway on

      Hey conservatives, it’s nice that your incompetent yes men are protecting the god king for you….but like. This is one of the consequences. You’ve got idiots running everything. Good luck, lol.

    5. Cheddaagoblin on

      I often argue we’re not in the worst timeline, just one of the dumbest. Imagine if they were competent.

    6. Late-Dingo-8567 on

      O is this why hiring strictly based on loyalty tests is a bad idea?  

      The justice department is incapable of acting in the public interest.  

    7. SnooPaintings7581 on

      By rushing to score political points they’ve risked bungling up the case. The same thing might happen with Charlie Kirk’s assassin.

    8. This is what to expect at the Utah shooter trial. „Oh you gave the victim a day of rememberance before the trial? Surely that womt bias anything“

    9. These guys can’t just spout the line of no comment at this time.

      Just fund reporters to yell out asking thoughts about radical left luigi and they’ll keep biting

    10. There is a very real possibility of jury nullification if this case manages to go through.

    11. CornFedIABoy on

      Why is the potential for a mistrial not included in the list of possible sanctions?

    12. ArchitectOfFate on

      „Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Margaret Garnett instructed prosecutors to advise Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to tell other Justice Department officials that any further violations…“

      And people wonder why our courts are glacial.

    13. axolotlorange on

      Obviously Luigi Mangione did it. We all know that.

      While that it’s important, it is not what is important in a criminal trial.

      The government has the burden of proving that he did it and the defendant has a right to a fair trial. That means an impartial jury.

      I’ve been a career trial attorney in criminal law. The State does not make public announcements about one of their cases before a trial. At most a short press release with bare minimum allegations and a comment that details won’t be released. After trial, you can release more as it is a little different.

      You learn this day one as a prosecutor. Your job is not to win, it is do justice. Winning is obviously important, but ethics come first.

      Defense learns it as well (but they have more room to make exceptions because their role is different.

      If you see a lawyer, defense or prosecution, doing a press conference or making public statements before a trial they are trying to manipulate the public. It’s why you don’t do it.

    14. ChefCurryYumYum on

      This is what happens when you have an extremely corrupt leader who values absolutely loyalty over everything else, like competency.

    15. InfinityComplexxx on

      PLEASE let him walk on this administration being so fucking stupid

    16. TweakedNipple on

      I thought this whole trial got fucked when ~~Netflix~~ Hulu / HBO Max put out a documentary months ago about it which included interviews / statements from Eric Adams?

    17. That ironic moment when he gets away with murdering the 1% because the 1% can’t shut up about it.

    18. Why do I feel like something’s going to happen where this case is going to have to get dismissed because someone does something stupid and it just breaks the law to the point that you can’t convict him of anything. I don’t know if we’ve already reached that point and they’re just desperately trying to cover it up. But nobody has been handling this court case with any amount of ethics and I do not know how you’re able to find an impartial jury with this case.

    19. Reverend-Cleophus on

      You ever see someone who tried so hard to dunk a basketball on a fast break over someone only to get hung up on the rim and fail miserably? Thats the DOJ on this case.

    20. Spacebotzero on

      Got it. So now they will attack and threaten the judge and all of those in the chain of command for making this legit Judicial decision.

    21. CaptainReynoldshere1 on

      There’s going to be further problems. We all know Trump can’t keep his mouth shut to save his life. It doesn’t matter if there are consequences.

    22. The federal charges likely weren’t gonna stick anyway (being a single act of murder within the jurisdiction of a single state), but some of the shit these idiots said might actually be bad enough to warrant a mistrial at the state level.

    Leave A Reply