Just like he had confidence in the candidate that said his opponent should be handed to the Chinese. Carney has bad judgment and needs to be shamed into making obvious political decisions. It’s two days too late now, better late than never at this point
srry_u_r_triggered on
This reflects poor judgment, but the broader issue is longstanding mismanagement of the file dating back to the Trudeau era. A more constructive approach would have included a grandfathering provision, or at minimum, a realistic budget for fair compensation. My concern is that many frustrated owners may retain their previously non-restricted rifles, which, now outside the legal framework, risk being lost to the black market.
The ministers comments basically incentivize moral hazard.
Hopeful_CanadianMtl on
His blindspot for ministers with poor optics is really annoying.
I think that it also signals that he doesn’t take the buyback program all that seriously anyway.
chat-lu on
> In the recording, Anandasangaree also offers to pay the acquaintance the difference between the federal government’s compensation and what he paid for his now-banned firearms, and says Carney is sticking with the policy to appease voters in Quebec.
Voters in Quebec who *do not want this*.
Yes, we want more gun control than the rest of Canada but we *have* more gun control than the rest of Canada. And yes, we think that we need stricter gun laws and stricter enforcement to *limit the flow of illegal guns*.
This buyback, we didn’t ask for it and we don’t want it.
And I think that tackling the issue of illegal guns from the US would please *all* of Canada, not just Quebec.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
4 Kommentare
Just like he had confidence in the candidate that said his opponent should be handed to the Chinese. Carney has bad judgment and needs to be shamed into making obvious political decisions. It’s two days too late now, better late than never at this point
This reflects poor judgment, but the broader issue is longstanding mismanagement of the file dating back to the Trudeau era. A more constructive approach would have included a grandfathering provision, or at minimum, a realistic budget for fair compensation. My concern is that many frustrated owners may retain their previously non-restricted rifles, which, now outside the legal framework, risk being lost to the black market.
The ministers comments basically incentivize moral hazard.
His blindspot for ministers with poor optics is really annoying.
I think that it also signals that he doesn’t take the buyback program all that seriously anyway.
> In the recording, Anandasangaree also offers to pay the acquaintance the difference between the federal government’s compensation and what he paid for his now-banned firearms, and says Carney is sticking with the policy to appease voters in Quebec.
Voters in Quebec who *do not want this*.
Yes, we want more gun control than the rest of Canada but we *have* more gun control than the rest of Canada. And yes, we think that we need stricter gun laws and stricter enforcement to *limit the flow of illegal guns*.
This buyback, we didn’t ask for it and we don’t want it.
And I think that tackling the issue of illegal guns from the US would please *all* of Canada, not just Quebec.