Marit Stiles von NDP sagt, dass Axing Top -Mitarbeiter nur der Beginn der Transformation der Partei sind
https://www.thestar.com/politics/provincial/ndps-marit-stiles-says-axing-top-staffers-is-just-the-start-of-partys-transformation/article_9d489596-56f1-4244-9129-3b3dd5954a4f.html
4 Kommentare
>While the party did not have organized groups such as the New Leaf Liberals openly campaigning for a new leader, Stiles attributed the lower-than-expected vote mainly to a “few people from each riding” who wanted to change.
This right here is the most important thing, I voted against a review, because being leaderless in the end scared me, and I’d rather not have us be like OLP right now. But also, no one actually organized against her, and I say this as someone who’s of ONDY. The ONDY’s actual organizing was to pass the nuclear compromise, and a bunch of other policy resolutions, which we all succeeded in. Marit’s „few people from each riding“ line perfectly sums up what happened.
They should start by axing the leader – the leader is the one responsible for hiring top staffers, and responsible for under delivering to the point she only scored a 68% on a review – which generally should mean resignation. Replacing staffers is like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
Folks should remember Stiles was the only one to put their hand up after Horwath stepped down.
68% isn’t as bad as it usually indicates considering the party has barely attracted interest in the job.
Compounded with the OLP being leaderless, I don’t see it as advantageous of the leader of the official opposition steps down to leave Doug Ford completely unchallenged.
I think most of the complaints are coming from a specific wing of the party that doesn’t want to shed the focus that had kept the party back.
The problem with the NDP is they change leaders but not the staffers or campaign team enough.
I think people underestimate just how important the team is. A bad team can bring down the leader just as much as a good leader can lose with a bad team.