Share.

    26 Kommentare

    1. Silly-avocatoe on

      In a Cassandra-worthy clip that’s gone viral, Buttigieg told a questioner during last year’s presidential campaign that free speech would be under threat in the U.S. because Trump “wants to revoke the licenses of television networks that broadcast coverage that he disagrees with.”

      “I can’t think of a more direct attack on the freedom of speech than a government official, or a wannabe government official, saying, ‘I want to punish a television network because of their journalism.’”

    2. Historical_Bend_2629 on

      It doesn’t take a lot of predicting power to understand Trump; he cannot stand criticism, his ideology is himself, he is the state. The only principle is the self.

    3. AetherKnight on

      We all knew this was inevitable, this article seems to uplift Buttigeg standing for future positions

    4. rougepenguin on

      Yeah but he’s an LGBT liberal so give it a day or two and I’m sure the self-styled leftists will have some reason he’s actually worse than Trump.

    5. OnDrugsTonight on

      >In a Cassandra-worthy clip that’s gone viral, Buttigieg told a questioner during last year’s presidential campaign that free speech would be under threat in the U.S. because Trump “wants to revoke the licenses of television networks that broadcast coverage that he disagrees with.”

      I mean, I love Pete and I hope he’ll go far, but that’s like predicting that the next Pope is going to be a Catholic or that the sun will rise in the east tomorrow.

    6. Buttigieg nailed it last year, Trump’s always been about gagging critics, and now he’s got the FCC pulling Kimmel’s show over a joke. This isn’t free speech, it’s revenge porn for MAGA snowflakes.

    7. muchnycrunchny on

      And it still doesn’t change the minds of the loyalists that said it would never happen.

    8. Specialist-Day6721 on

      if only we could hear what she has to say now. I’m sure she would just make up some bull shit excuse, because it’s a fucking cult.

    9. True-Surprise1222 on

      just as an FYI call your congresspeople:

      https://reclaimthenet.org/push-to-dismantle-section-230-expand-online-surveillance

      this is bipartisan and will be used to target trans folks and likely remove them from any online conversation

      democrats are supporting this.

      >Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat, echoed that sentiment. “For years I have supported repealing Section 230,” she said, arguing that the law is outdated and was crafted for a different era.

      >While she prefaced her comments by claiming to oppose censorship, her solution was the same as Graham’s: eliminate legal protections for platforms to create a “better environment online.”

      >Klobuchar veered into broader political territory, citing a wave of threats and violence targeting lawmakers.

      >She asked Patel to commit to conveying her concerns to the White House and **emphasized a need to “move forward” on both speech laws and gun control measures.**

      not some random no name dem. Amy Klobuchar is advocating for laws that will remove your free speech

    10. Phonic-Frog on

      He didn’t predict anything; Trump literally tried the same shit in his first term. If people had actually paid attention and voted accordingly we wouldn’t be in this mess now.

    11. This was part of his effort as Harris surrogate, talking to undecided voters

    12. The face that hog makes as she talks to mayor Pete like he’s the dumbass

    13. SunbeamSailor67 on

      For the record, notice how Trump’s handlers will NEVER let him share the stage with Pete. Intelligence, truth and people who actually served America are Trump’s kryptonite.

      Plus, he’s gay…something conservatives fear more than that devil they also believe in.

    14. Ambitious_Count9552 on

      >Carr had already singled out NBC for including Harris in an Saturday Night Live skit before the election. 

      Talk about „antiquated“ (which is what Carr said about disallowing monopolies to form with network/syndicated TV)…Trump HOSTED the damn show before the 2016 election. Anyone can watch that on demand on Peacock whenever they want…“equal time“ means nothing in the age of streaming, „any time“ is equal time now. Kamala literally appeared for a few minutes in a SINGLE sketch, just fed up with endless, convenient lies that only fit the fascist agenda, and has nothing to do with working people or civil society. It’s just about scoring points and looking „tough“ on whatever.

    15. Is it saying what was happening really a „prediction“?

      He didn’t appear to be speaking in hypotheticals.

    16. No-More-Lettuce on

      I would love to have that lady interviewed now. I wonder how she voted and if any opinions have changed since then.

    17. TrailerParkFrench on

      We all predicted this. But still, I hope I’ll get to vote for Buttigieg for president some day.

    18. xxBeepBopBoopxx on

      The majority that voted for Trump don’t understand, don’t care, or don’t appreciate free speech. All they care about is belonging to people that say the same narrow-minded things

    19. Opening-Dependent512 on

      At this point any normal dictator/authoritarian/dystopian action is fairly predictable.

    Leave A Reply