Share.

    3 Kommentare

    1. Basically, the authors argue the US is mostly racing against itself. It’s not that China doesn’t care about AI, they do, but they aren’t in some all out existential race to AGI. China focuses on practical AI applications etc – more thinking of AI as a normal technology, vs AGI. Big tech is incentivized to hype up the China race narrative as much as possible to stave off regulation and get government contracts.

    2. Is anyone surprised that the US would mislead ? The US has come down to two things, power, and profit. The every day workers are going to be pushed into poverty.

    3. In my opinion, AGI needs infrastructure that perhaps they are looking for in the United States, but new programming languages ​​are still needed (transforms are an advance but they are not enough), new programming paradigms, all of this making new hardware necessary. All this for a true AGI but the term has become so ambiguous that they can pass off a complex narrow AI as an AGI. There is still a long way to go to reach what we have in mind as an AGI, which is why China is not fully involved in this but rather in the specialization of AIs.

    Leave A Reply