„Libertarian“ Rand Paul sagt, Sie haben kein Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung

    https://newrepublic.com/post/200500/libertarian-rand-paul-free-speech-charlie-kirk-reaction?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_campaign=SF_TNR&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Twitter

    Share.

    37 Kommentare

    1. PhoenixTineldyer on

      Actually we do and it’s in the Constitution, right at the beginning of the Bill of Rights, and it has been there the whole time

    2. Is it any surprise that a dude named after one of the preeminent stupid motherfuckers of the last century is saying stupid shit? Nominative determinism really fucked that dude hard.

    3. Sorry Rand but yes we do. Get you copy of the Constitution and read it. That is if you can make out the words because it’s been wadded up and shit on so much by this administration and five of our Supreme Court judges.

    4. they’re almost all faker-tarians not really libertarian

      That inherent right wing desire for hierarchy, authority and power overrides everything

    5. misterlakatos on

      Remember when libertarians cried like toddlers during the pandemic because they had to wear masks and get vaccinated?

    6. Same_Set8195 on

      This is why „Right Wing Libertarian“ is an oxymoron because they always turn out to be Authoritarian Fascists in the end.

    7. I hate that we have to start things with „Imagine if Obama/Biden said this“ but imagine how mad…the republican congressmen would be if they did. They’re the biggest fighters in the game. They rile their base up.

      They’d have this on the news 24/7. They’d be interviewing people on the streets. Look how organized they are. That’s their power. 50 different people all tweeting out „this is war“ at the same time. Where’s our unity? D’s can’t even endorse their leading candidate in one of the most liberal cities. This is why we lose. They’re pussies, in other countries half of our D’s would be considered R’s.

    8. ChymickGaming on

      “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

      https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/

      He seems to not know the U.S. Constitution or the content of government websites. Or, he is indirectly stating that he does not support the Constitution and will work to undermine it.

      It can only be one or the other. Both are grounds to be barred from serving in public office.

    9. NamelessResearcher on

      First of all, Paul, get a haircut. You look like the grown-up version of Pigpen from *Peanuts*. And second, I don’t want to hear any denials of free speech from a man who excused Trump’s hateful rhetoric for years.

    10. Alternative_Owl5302 on

      True and correct to the spirit of free speech with reservations.

      The Supreme Court has ruled that the following types of speech are not protected:

      1. Incitement to imminent lawless action
      (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969)

      2. True threats
      (Virginia v. Black, 2003)

      3. Obscenity
      (Miller v. California, 1973)

      4. Child pornography
      (New York v. Ferber, 1982)

      5. Defamation (libel and slander)
      (New York Times v. Sullivan, 1964)

      6. Fighting words (rarely applied today)
      (Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 1942)

      7. Speech integral to criminal conduct
      (e.g. fraud, blackmail)

      8. Certain commercial speech
      (e.g. false advertising)

      I’m sure lawyers will have far more.

    11. BoticelliBaby on

      Rand Paul doxxed my mom. She got thousands of death threats to her home and work for months. Because she said slavery was in fact, not a nice experience for enslaved people.
      Fuck Rand Paul.

    12. phoenix14830 on

      Thanks undecided voters. You couldn’t be bothered to vote against this, now the right is flexing fascist dictatorship threats and actions daily. The Democrats have issues, too, but nowhere near this scale or consistency. I remember when Obama wearing a tan suit was front-page news.

    13. Yes, we do. It is enshrined in the Constitution right before your beloved Second Amendment.

    14. „a morals clause … or a conduct clause“

      And where was that shit when right-wingers were doing far worse than people simply quoting Kirk’s bullshit?

      These hypocritical clowns aren’t being taken seriously for damn good reason. If they can’t take what they put out, at just a mere fraction, then they best sit their sorry asses down & shut the fuck up forever.

      Oh, and they should brace themselves now for when their dear leader finally kicks it, they’ll get to see what celebrating an asshole’s death really looks like then.

    15. JohnWComicsGuy on

      You really do. In fact, it is the First right guaranteed to us by the Founders in the Constitution. If you want to take that one away, then your people don’t deserve the Second.

    16. TheUpperHand on

      I didn’t realize there was an exclusion to the First Amendment for hurt feelings…

    17. Free speech is a basic liberty and needed for a democracy. Take it away and you lose it. It’s part of their plan to keep power.

    18. Free speech means the government can’t arrest you for what you say. It doesn’t mean you can’t lose your job or be ostracized by your community.
      That said, fuck Rand Paul and the GOP

    19. KingWhompus on

      „Don’t Tread on Me“ has become „Tread on me Harder, Daddy“. Pussies.

    20. SluttyCosmonaut on

      Libertarians are the most duplicitous people you will ever encounter.

    21. Ok_Door_9720 on

      Conservatives used to act so smug while dropping this one all the time:

      „I disagree with what you have to say, but golly gee, I’ll defend your right to say it!“

      I guess that only applies to racial slurs and what not….

    22. The “free speech absolutists” have been pretty fucking quiet the last week or so.

    23. Yes there is freedom of speech but there isn’t freedom of consequences. I know there is hypocrisy from the right. They always complaining about being having to be PC.

      This is their revenge. It’s always revenge for them. They always want to play the victim.

      Since they control the govt, they going to punish the left anyway they can. But totally ignore it was conservative on conservative violence.

    24. It boggles the mind that citizens of this country push so hard to be able to partake in the rights afforded to us by the Constitution and the various laws and regulations that we have in this country and then our elected officials pop up like prairie dogs and say “naw”.

      Listen here….elected officials…I’ll only say this once.

      We, the citizens of this country, have more rights than you do.

      That’s right…..we have more than you….you see, you are bound by things like the “establishment clause” where we citizens aren’t. There are limitations on political activity that elected officials must follow that aren’t imposed on the citizens.

      Maybe you should educate yourself on these things.

      You work for us….not the other way around, paully. Focus on your damned job and stop saying stupid stuff. We expect better than that.

    25. They are rallying against the idea of being called ‚fascist‘. Meanwhile Glenn Beck this morning called Biden fascist, which would of course mean Biden was far-right, and have spent years calling Democrats communists.

    26. One_Cantaloupe_9522 on

      Really? Then why the fuck were they crying about it for the past several years?

    27. TylerDurden1985 on

      Why don’t we start calling the employers of charlie kirk supporters and letting them know their employees are enthusiastically supporting and cheering on a white supremacist who said heinous shit daily, made antisemitic statements, racist statements, anti lgbt, etc etc?

      „Hey, just so you know, your employee is cheering on a well known white supremacist, racist, mysoginist, anti-semite. Here’s some of the heinous shit he said, and they’re ccheering it on. This isn’t congruent with your company’s values I’m sure, and I know you’ll take it upon yourself to do the right thing“

    28. Dapper-Condition6041 on

      Compendium of notable Charlie Kirk statements:

      * At a Turning Point USA event in 2023, Kirk argued, “We must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty… But I think it’s worth it. I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment.”
      * On his radio show, Kirk dismissed empathy as a harmful idea. “I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that does a lot of damage.”
      * During a heated exchange on Jubilee’s Surrounded, he claimed Black people were “better” in the 1940s. “They were actually better in the 1940s. It was bad. It was evil. But what happened? Something changed. They committed less crimes… Black America is worse than it has been in the last 80 years.”
      * On child pregnancy after rape? When asked how he would advise his daughter in a disturbing scenario, he said, “The answer is yes. The baby would be delivered.”
      * At a TPUSA event, he compared trans identity to blackface. “A man who calls himself trans is wearing ‘woman face,’ no different than I would wear Black face trying to be a Black person. It’s assuming an identity that isn’t yours.”
      * On his radio show, he claimed Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson were “affirmative action picks” and went further, “Black women do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.”
      * After Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s engagement, he fantasized about her becoming more conservative. “Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.”
      * On X, once commented, “Gun control, like vaccines and masks, is focused on making people feel ‘safe’ by taking freedoms away from others. Don’t fall for it.”
      * Kirk often railed against retirement. “For future retirees, people under the age of 45, we should absolutely raise the retirement age. I’m not a fan of retirement. I don’t think retirement is biblical… I think, what a waste of the gifts that God has given you.”

    29. Ok_Series_4580 on

      Like most republicans, Rand is full of shit regarding the constitution or rule of law.

      They continue to show us that they will break the rules any chance they get.

    30. mrbigglessworth on

      Look at them, trying to consolidate power and force us to give up our rights

    31. turtle75377 on

      That actually tracks perfectly will normal libertarianism.
      It’s just reskined feudalism where rules apply to the lower class and not them.

    Leave A Reply