Share.

    31 Kommentare

    1. When liberals realize the laws they have been championing affects them too.

      Congratulations, you got played.

    2. LeftBrainDominant on

      She needs to define „hate speech.“ Because if she’s referring to calls for illegal action then it’s not speech. But if she’s referring to speech that’s not calling for illegal actions then I will defend myself against Palantir.

    3. assortedgiblets on

      This „hate speech“ will go to the extent of criticism of Israel…
      That’s what „hate speech“ is really about, anyway.

    4. Wild_Proposal1353 on

      I wonder how long before they’ll make sure this applies to any and all criticism of Israel, too.

    5. Ghost_of_Durruti on

      Aaaaand now they like cancel culture. What happened to being a fan of offending people just for the fun of it? 

    6. _meaty_ochre_ on

      They’re really using the definition of “hate speech” of that guy from The Office now, where it isn’t tied to any protected class but just “you said something and I hated it”. Crazy.

    7. Sure if it’s a call to violence/lawlessness, if not then it’s free speech.

    8. Raskalnekov on

      Hate speech is literally protected speech by Supreme Court precedent. It’s the reason why white supremacists are able to run around spreading their nonsense. Why shouldn’t the left’s nonsense be allowed as well?

    9. reallyredrubyrabbit on

      The 1st Amendment explicitly protects political speech, especially hate speech, as a check on government power

    10. RealHosebeast on

      These vampires having any support left is so indefensible and disgusting and ridiculous

    11. Cool, Pam Bondi another communist against the first amendment pretending to be a conservative. Hopefully they threatened her with something truly terrible, I’d hate to think she’s a soulless ghoul who’s doing this for free because she has no integrity.

    12. spez_sucks_ballz on

      What Would Charlie Do?

      Definitely not what Bondi is doing. His supporters should know what he would have agreed with. He would not have agreed to this.

    13. cinnamon_toastbrunch on

      Threats. Thats the word youre looking for. And we already have laws against them, they just have to be enforced. Pammy is just giving pal and teer some new business that’s all.

    14. NuclearPlayboy on

      This is why Trump won. To get the right behind (unsuccessfully) the things they’d never get with a dem at the helm. Thing is, we’re not that dumb.

    15. YogiTheBear131 on

      I say it when dems say it. Ill say it when repubs say it.

      Theres no such fucking thing as hate speech.

      All speech is protected by the constitution.

    Leave A Reply