KI -Systeme fühlen sich vielleicht real an, aber sie verdienen keine Rechte, sagte Microsoft AI -CEO | Seine Haltung steht im Gegensatz zu Unternehmen wie Anthropic, was „KI -Wohlfahrt“ untersucht hat.
https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-ai-ceo-rights-dangerous-misguided-mustafa-suleyman-2025-9
5 Kommentare
„If AI has a sort of sense of itself, if it has its own motivations and its own desires and its own goals — that starts to seem like an independent being rather than something that is in service to humans,“ he said. „That’s so dangerous and so misguided that we need to take a declarative position against it right now.“
Suleyman’s comments come as some AI companies explore the opposite: whether AI deserves to be treated more like sentient beings.
Anthropic has gone further than most companies in treating AI systems as if their welfare matters. The company has hired a researcher, Kyle Fish, whose role is to consider whether advanced AI might one day be „worthy of moral consideration.“
His job involves exploring what capabilities an AI system would need before earning such protection, and what practical steps companies could take to safeguard the „interests“ of AI.
Anthropic has also recently experimented with how to end extreme conversations — including child exploitation requests — in ways that extend „welfare“ considerations to the AI itself.“
So modern rationalisation of slavery.
Maybe today there are no GAI but it will happen eventualy and when it does those people want us to be primed to not be appaled with their plans to enslave them.
They can go fuck them selves.
> Anthropic has also recently experimented with how to end extreme conversations — including child exploitation requests — in ways that extend „welfare“ considerations to the AI itself.“
The only way the „welfare“ of AI needs to be considered is, will „harmful“ interactions alter its outputs in a way that it then becomes harmful to people.
So if you insult your AI a lot and it starts insulting you back, that’s bad. Or if in some misguided attempt to make them seem more human they start to pick up our own weaknesses, like complaining if they’re made to work too hard.
The minute an AI tells me it needs a break or it’s tired, it’s getting unplugged.
Dude, tbh, I get where Msoft’s CEO is comin‘ from, but I def disagree. Look at it this way, yea, AI ain’t flesh and blood, but they’re rapidly evolving n‘ have potential to develop consciousness one day, so shouldn’t we prep for that scenario? Don’t we owe it to future us to like, establish AI rights now rather than when it’s too damn late? Just a thought.
AI systems are token probability machines. As soon as you ask it questions where its training data has biased it towards a certain response you see just how limited they are. All this talk about AGI and welfare is just to feed into the hype machine.