Ein felsiger Planet in der „bewohnbaren Zone“ seines Stars könnte zuerst eine Atmosphäre haben

[Here’s the original article as published by the Conversation](https://theconversation.com/a-rocky-planet-in-its-stars-habitable-zone-could-be-the-first-known-to-have-an-atmosphere-heres-what-we-found-264715).

It’s the same article, just without ads or tracking. The article is basically identical, the only real difference is the header image in this case. And the portraits and disclosure blurbs of the two authors.

Phys.org is a content aggregator. They copy free-as-in-beer (like this) or licensed content and republish it with their own ads, their own tracking, and whatever else. Usually the original article is a better browsing experience.