Close Menu
    Politics

    Der Oberste Gericht

    Share.
    View 30 Comments

    30 Kommentare

    1. CrimsonFeetofKali on

      Universities can’t look at race when admitting a student but ICE can when hunting people for deportation. Sure, this is a democracy. /s

    2. zenerat on

      This has always been the goal. If you are anything other than a white American you better keep your papers on you before you disappear into a black bag.

    3. darsynia on

      Abysmal ruling, unsurprising, unfortunately. I can’t even imagine how trapped the liberal justices are feeling right now. It’s a futile, miserable fight, they can’t die, get sick, or step down, or it will get even worse.

    5. smersh101 on

      Let me guess – shadow docket decision that conveniently allows them to avoid going through the effort of justifying their reasoning.

    7. Stranger-Sun on

      This pack of partisan dogs on the court just carved out part of the 14th amendement to our Constitution. They haven’t met an amendment they liked other than the 2nd, and they don’t care if all of us know it.

    10. fowlraul on

      Shocking that they said this was the plan for four years and they implemented the plan.

    11. Bubbly-Two-3449 on

      I’m not sure how we can call them anything but a [kangaroo court ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court)at this point.

      >**Kangaroo court** is an informal pejorative term for a court that ignores recognized standards of law or justice, carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides, and is typically convened [ad hoc](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hoc).[^([1])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court#cite_note-1)[^([2])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court#cite_note-2) A kangaroo court may ignore [due process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process) and come to a predetermined conclusion. **The term is also used for a court held by a legitimate judicial authority, but which intentionally or structurally disregards the court’s legal or ethical obligations**

    13. Marxian_factotum on

      This (illegitimate) SCOTUS is simply the bought-and-paid-for product of the billionaires who have purchased the federal judiciary over the past four decades.

    17. TNGreruns4ever on

      This whole system of government works based on the consent of the governed (of/by/for the people).

      The political class maintained its legitimacy by trying to take actions that (at least somewhat) reflected public sentiment.

      How far can you stray from public sentiment before you lose the consent of the governed?

    21. Saar007808 on

      What a deplorable result – these “justices” will never have to experience this kind of racial profiling and its unconstitutional application – shameful

    22. zmunky on

      Now we truly have racism baked in. Get used to being fucked with if you are not printer paper white with the last name Smith. Also the supreme Court has illegally ruled against the constitution, this violates the 4th 5th and 14th amendments. Um so now that they are operating outside of the laws is when we are supposed to remind them what the laws are keeping from happening? Right?

    24. DuckterDoom on

      This opens up the driving while black argument. Why did you pull me over? Because you’re black. No law broken.

    26. Ziabatsu on

      Don’t put Sotomayor on the graphic like she voted for this. She was on the dissent.

    27. shawsghost on

      I knew the Roberts Court was corrupt, but DAYUM, this is about as nakedly corrupt as it gets. They let this shit slide, they’ll let ANYTHING slide. The rule of law is over in the US.

    30. R2-D2Vandelay on

      Everyone who was on the fence or for some reason thought that Kamala was not the ONLY correct option. This is all on you. Good fucking job.

    Leave A Reply