Der Chef von Europol fordert Tech -Giganten auf, verschlüsselte Botschaften zu entsperren: „Sie werden die Demokratie ohne sie nicht durchsetzen können.“
https://www.belganewsagency.eu/europol-chief-calls-on-tech-giants-to-unlock-encrypted-messages
Von Dry_Row_7050
48 Kommentare
And yet democracy has been managing for many decades.
>She drew an analogy between digital encryption and a locked door during a physical police search.
>“When we have a search warrant and we are in front of a house and the door is locked, and you know that the criminal is inside of the house, the population will not accept that you cannot enter.”
She wants to be able to enter anyone’s house, at any time, with no warrant though.
Are you sure about that?
Then openly admit that you’re a fascist state. Without it you won’t be able to force this.
No it doesn’t. You would just like to be able to violate our privacy without a court order. „It’s for your own safety“ the oldest scaremongering tactics governments have been using for at least decades now.
So, what will happen when an anti-democratic party comes to power?
The worst of both worlds lol. Autocracy like China, but without the benefit of safety like their cities.
Ah yes.
„In the name of fighting pedocriminality, we need to access everything you see, type, and read. Think of the children! PS – does not apply to government officials, they’re trustworthy“
„Enforce democracy“ – love it 😀
Edit: It just dawned on me this phrase sounds straight out of „Peacemaker“. You really cannot make this sh*t up…
She needs to dial it the fuck down. Nothing democratic about this.
Focus on TAXING said tech giants to start with before interfering with everyone and opening pandora’s box for the next dictator to exploit.
„You won’t be able to subvert democracy without“
How about we democratically enforce these guys out of office in the next elections? 😛
Democracy is knowing what government workers, institutions and politicians are doing and thus knowing who they have contact with. Not the general populace.
Okay, I’ll agree… if you make all convos of politicians, company bosses, lawyers & bankers available for us to check that democracy is enforced at all levels that actually matter.
What? It would endanger democracy? Oh, really?
_Democracy enforcement intensifies._
No thank you, my messages are my privacy. What do they want to read about, the shopping lists my wife sends me?
No it isn’t letters and telecommunications can’t be opened in the Netherlands according our constitution, it’s called briefgeheim and was implemented in the constitution in 1848.
Her and her politicians cronies messages first.
I’d be happier if social media companies were forced to reveal their algorithms.
What a great moment in time to be pushing through a highly unpopular policy.
So that’ll be a no to proper immigration controls, a no to sufficient action on climate change and yes to being able to read peoples private messages.
If you really want to fight crime, legalise drugs.
So democracy needs mass surveillance? Do these people listen to themselves?
I for one will go out of my way to communicate with pidgeons from now on if this bs passes. Sue me.
So this fuck is responsible for chat control coming up again and again?
You will be democratized. Please do not resist.
How comes? democracy has been running for quite long before the arrival of these dinosaurs..
The fight for Managed Democracy continues
ENFORCE DEMOCRACY.
Enough said.
What a fallacious argument.
„en… Enforce democracy“
Lifts eyebrows
To save democracy we must destroy democracy
„Enforce democracy“? Democracy isn’t something you impose on people, it’s something they choose and participate in. You don’t enforce democracy, you enable it by protecting rights and privacy. Strip that away, and what’s left isn’t democracy at all. Please get rid of this chief, she isn’t for democracy, she’s for autocracy.
Furthermore, her example about why people shouldn’t expect anonymity is deeply flawed:
*“When we have a search warrant and we are in front of a house and the door is locked, and you know that the criminal is inside of the house, the population will not accept that you cannot enter.”*
Which is very true, but that analogy actually supports the opposite point. Yes, you can break into the house, but only **after** obtaining a search warrant. And crucially, the door is still **locked** you don’t magically get a universal key. You still have to **physically break it down**.
The same applies to encryption. Even with legal authority, if a phone is encrypted, law enforcement doesn’t get a master key to unlock it, they still have to **break** the encryption.
Fun fact, you cannot enforce dictatorships either!
„Managed Democracy offers true Freedom: Freedom from the burden of choice.“
– Democracy Officer (Helldivers 2)
is social media encrypted? No & nobody is doing a gdmf thing about the lies & misinformation being spread through that so H T F breaching encryption on messaging is gonna make any difference is beyond me
A police? Advocating for a police state?!
Shocker!!
Oh boy, i’m so not ready to learn linux or graphene os
Is she crazy?!?
>She drew an analogy between digital encryption and a locked door during a physical police search.
>”When we have a search warrant and *we are in front of a house and the door is locked, and you know that the criminal is inside of the house, the population will not accept that you cannot enter*.”
Is she comparing the unlocking of encryption to having houses without door locking? Does she expect population to be OK with leaving their houses, their personal life, unlocked and open to anyone and to her?
I’m astonished
If you *enforce* democracy, it’s not democracy anymore.
who would fight for a europe like this in a war?
„Enforce“ democracy ? Don’t you see the problem ?
Good thing the Europol chief has no authority
Politicians are not included of course in this „enforced democratic“
Daz reich based europe is so back
WTF is this twat from my country babbling?
You are killing the body in order to cure a cold, and you use words like democracy to give you virtue to do as you please without scrutiny.
Anonymity is definitely a fundamental right. And we should not rely on tech giants: embrace Linux/OpenBSD, Tor, Monero etc. Avoid closed ecosystems like App Store/Play Store.
Yes, and North Korea has the word „democratic“ in the country name.
I can’t believe we are seriously considering mass surveillance. Disgusting.
Stasi 2.0… why wont she give her unlocked phone to us?