Share.

    3 Kommentare

    1. KingRabbit_ on

      >In their correspondence last month, the owners also claimed the initial public complaint that led to the demolition order “may have been racially motivated”.

      >No specific evidence was provided to substantiate that claim but legal counsel for the owners cited an apparent anonymous letter their clients claim to have received after Global News reported on the issue on Aug. 11, more than a year after the district received the original complaint.

      >That letter, which Global News has not independently verified to be authentic, allegedly said “Think of this as a lesson in what you can expect if you continue to live here. OR – go back to where you came from,” and “you are not special, you are just like the rest of us, even though your God is greed.”

      Sounds like bullshit to me, but I can easily imagine swaying opinions in a city like Vancouver.

      >“Our clients intend to apply for the necessary permits by the end of the week, and we ask that staff accept and process the application and make formal decision before council considers any remedial action.”

      That’s a new one. Applying for permits *after* construction is completed.

    2. Ask_DontTell on

      racially motivated or not (and this letter seems like something they made up tbh), they need to be held accountable for breaking the rules if Canada wants to be a rule based country.

    3. FFS, they didn’t have the permits from the district of West Vancouver to do the work. They proceeded to do the work and got caught. It’s not a case of anything other than don’t do work without the permits.

    Leave A Reply