DOJ sagt, Namen von zwei Associates Epstein haben 100.000 US -Dollar und 250.000 US -Dollar, um geheim zu bleiben

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/doj-says-names-two-associates-epstein-wired-100k-250k-stay-secret-rcna229408

    Share.

    29 Kommentare

    1. RepulsiveLoquat418 on

      let’s see the maga faithful twist themselves in knots to justify this.

    2. Accurate-Guava-3337 on

      Fuck that noise. Those 2 individuals had Non-Prosecution Agreements secured for them, so they are can’t be criminally prosecuted. So, now they are asking Trump to hide their names and he says, „Of course, buddies! May every day be a secret!“.

      Trump’s DOJ is blatantly hiding co-conspirators of sex trafficking minors. Hold all of them accountable.

    3. GestureArtist on

      DOJ protecting child rapists? Is Pam Bondi on the list? Why is she such a fucking coward when it comes to finding justice for sexually trafficked and abused children? Does she have children? Would she be so quiet if it were her kids?

    4. Orwells_Roses on

      Since when are potential suspects allowed to avoid investigation on the grounds that the answers might embarrass them?

      Such bullshit.

      „Prosecutors also wrote that “this individual was also named and featured prominently in the Herald series.”

      This would make it at least possible to guess who it might be, right? Let’s hear it.

    5. Gold-Perception-4467 on

      No full disclosure, and charge them with tax evasion as well. That’s how they got Capone.

    6. I don’t care who is on the list. Someone I love, someone I despise. It doesn’t matter. Hiding perpetrators so that ~~victims~~ survivors are not getting justice should in of itself be a crime.

      Show the guilty. ALL of them.

    7. Huge_Excitement4465 on

      [https://gizmodo.com/jeffrey-epstein-reportedly-invested-40-million-in-a-company-co-founded-by-peter-thiel-2000611462](https://gizmodo.com/jeffrey-epstein-reportedly-invested-40-million-in-a-company-co-founded-by-peter-thiel-2000611462)

      The New York Times [reported](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/04/business/jeffrey-epstein-peter-thiel-estate.html) on Wednesday that in 2015 and 2016, not long before his death, Epstein invested a substantial sum into a company that Thiel had co-founded. Valar Ventures, a venture capital firm that (like many of Thiel’s other companies) is named after a creature from J.R.R. Tolkein’s mythos, received $40 million from Epstein, according to the report. he investment, now valued at approximately $170 million according to confidential estate documents reviewed by The New York Times, represents a 325% return over nearly a decade. 

      In other reports: After his first arrest for sex crimes, Jeffrey Epstein tried to get into a new line of work: surveillance. In 2015, he partnered with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak to invest in a security tech startup called Reporty Homeland Security, now known as Carbyne. Leaked emails show that Epstein was using Barak to seek out opportunities in the surveillance industry and build connections with powerful figures around the globe, including American businessman Peter Thiel, the former director of Israeli signals intelligence, and two people in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s circle. [https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/leaked-emails-reveal-jeffrey-epsteins-143052842.html](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/leaked-emails-reveal-jeffrey-epsteins-143052842.html)

    8. iAmSamFromWSB on

      Sounds more like the pedophile protection department than the justice department. Not much justice being served over there these days.

    9. It’s pitiful that the DOJ has taken it upon itself to shield rape and trafficking suspects. I’m thinking that once this Orange Malignancy is excised from the government, all of those involved in hiding Epstein-related criminal activity need to be prosecuted and sentenced for obstruction of justice and for accessory after the fact.

    10. SoulTaker669 on

      Went from protect the children to fuck the children pretty quick. Not even a full year in.

    11. BobsonQwijibo on

      “The Justice Department cited privacy concerns expressed by the two individuals as the reason for not making their names public.”

      Um, what? Criminals can just politely request privacy and the DOJ is like, sure thing, buddy.

    Leave A Reply