While it’s good practice to make charts have 0 at the bottom, that doesn’t apply to temperature. 0°C isn’t particularly noteworthy because it’s not a minimum.
Misterwiskerstech on
Sorry, but the thing about data is beautiful is that the data is displayed in a way that makes the brain go “ahhh”. This makes the data hard to see and therefore harder to understand – the anthesis of what I’ve come to enjoy from this sub. The addition of an AI generated shark or an iceberg that is bigger than the data (and contains no data) also doesn’t help. The whole problem with this is that it seems completely AI created. AI can be a powerful tool in analyzing data; but has shown to be notoriously bad at caring about accuracy (see r/aislop ). I hope this as a trend does not persist in this Reddit.
My comment has nothing to do with climate change – I’m not a “denyer” and it seems as if the information has come from reputable sources. Which is incredibly important – but I feel we are on a precipice where we need to adequately cite and check our information as well as know how to spot disinformation.
TL;DR – was put off by AI shark and though charts were AI produced.
DanoPinyon on
18° F like seems like really cold.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
![[OC] Eine Visualisierung, die die Änderungen an der durchschnittlichen mittleren Oberflächenlufttemperatur weltweit zeigt (1901 - 2022)](https://www.bytesde.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/60u20403yknf1.png "[OC] Eine Visualisierung, die die Änderungen an der durchschnittlichen mittleren Oberflächenlufttemperatur weltweit zeigt (1901 – 2022)")
4 Kommentare
Source: [https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/united-kingdom](https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/united-kingdom)
Tools: [www.figma.com](http://www.figma.com) , [www.tableau.com](http://www.tableau.com)
Article: [https://medium.com/@aoluf/what-is-climate-change-the-impact-of-climate-change-6648582687ed](https://medium.com/@aoluf/what-is-climate-change-the-impact-of-climate-change-6648582687ed)
While it’s good practice to make charts have 0 at the bottom, that doesn’t apply to temperature. 0°C isn’t particularly noteworthy because it’s not a minimum.
Sorry, but the thing about data is beautiful is that the data is displayed in a way that makes the brain go “ahhh”. This makes the data hard to see and therefore harder to understand – the anthesis of what I’ve come to enjoy from this sub. The addition of an AI generated shark or an iceberg that is bigger than the data (and contains no data) also doesn’t help. The whole problem with this is that it seems completely AI created. AI can be a powerful tool in analyzing data; but has shown to be notoriously bad at caring about accuracy (see r/aislop ). I hope this as a trend does not persist in this Reddit.
My comment has nothing to do with climate change – I’m not a “denyer” and it seems as if the information has come from reputable sources. Which is incredibly important – but I feel we are on a precipice where we need to adequately cite and check our information as well as know how to spot disinformation.
TL;DR – was put off by AI shark and though charts were AI produced.
18° F like seems like really cold.