If he’s there to give ideas to our government to implement from his manifesto, then he can take off.
If he’s there to do what the article says, then he can do that and then take off.
Guys like this and this manifesto *IS* the US government now and we need to stop pretending they will shake their heads and just go back to the way it was. We need to hear anything and everything in regards to future relations.
Allianya on
My gut reaction is hell fucking no, and might warrant bugging my politicians for this.
Though, the pragmatist in me says well letting your enemies speak the sheer stupidity of Project 2025 could actually be a good thing for us. Like know thy enemy, plus it will help legislators understand how dangerous this individual and movement is.
Aka I just hate every aspect of this and don’t know what the lesser evil is…
green_tory on
>The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) said Roberts is speaking to cabinet about trade issues because he knows the Trump administration’s playbook.
>The PMO added it would be beneficial for cabinet to hear Roberts’s perspective and understand the White House’s priorities as the government prepares for the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) review next year.
I suspect that he does. What I’m wondering is what he hopes to gain by speaking to Cabinet; or if he is doing so simply because it appeals to his ego.
In any case, I hope that our ministers bare in mind that Roberts is a dangerous political agent with his own motivations and goals; and is one who has no loyalty to Canada.
>Some of Trump’s policies to date have echoed Project 2025’s goals, including gutting government departments, cracking down on immigration and using his office to target his enemies.
Before the unhinged comments that would be typical from some people on here…
he’s speaking so that Carney’s Cabinet actually understands the Trump mindset, and how can they pivot so Canada can maximize our outcome while still satisfying Trump.
Football Coaching 101 – you can’t compete in a game against your opponent unless you understand their playbook.
LazyImmigrant on
Okay, i am pretty close a partisan Liberal, but this seems like a move someone who has hit a wall will make. This guy giving a TED talk to the Canadian federal government is not going to help us either secure a deal with the US or help us move on if we don’t.
Fadore on
I think this is a little bit of „know your enemy“ strategy here.
Carney isn’t going to be falling for Project 2025, but if there’s anyone who knows the key principles driving the current US administration, it will be this Roberts guy.
DarreToBe on
This is one of the most evil people in the world in my opinion and I don’t care what perspective he has to share with our government even if we are worse off having not received it from him directly. I don’t think he or his organization should have any contact with our government whatsoever. I suppose this may not be a substantive comment, but we deal with the US administration because we have to. We do not have to do this.
Routine_Soup2022 on
This is straight up “Art of War” type stuff. You have to know your opponents mindset. I really like the way this government is paying attention to experts, even if this is a little unconventional. We need to do unconventional and different in this country right now so bring it on.
Tranter156 on
Reminds me of the Machiavellian advice. Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer. As long as the article is correct about the reason for this session it seems smart.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
9 Kommentare
If he’s there to give ideas to our government to implement from his manifesto, then he can take off.
If he’s there to do what the article says, then he can do that and then take off.
Guys like this and this manifesto *IS* the US government now and we need to stop pretending they will shake their heads and just go back to the way it was. We need to hear anything and everything in regards to future relations.
My gut reaction is hell fucking no, and might warrant bugging my politicians for this.
Though, the pragmatist in me says well letting your enemies speak the sheer stupidity of Project 2025 could actually be a good thing for us. Like know thy enemy, plus it will help legislators understand how dangerous this individual and movement is.
Aka I just hate every aspect of this and don’t know what the lesser evil is…
>The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) said Roberts is speaking to cabinet about trade issues because he knows the Trump administration’s playbook.
>The PMO added it would be beneficial for cabinet to hear Roberts’s perspective and understand the White House’s priorities as the government prepares for the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) review next year.
I suspect that he does. What I’m wondering is what he hopes to gain by speaking to Cabinet; or if he is doing so simply because it appeals to his ego.
In any case, I hope that our ministers bare in mind that Roberts is a dangerous political agent with his own motivations and goals; and is one who has no loyalty to Canada.
>Some of Trump’s policies to date have echoed Project 2025’s goals, including gutting government departments, cracking down on immigration and using his office to target his enemies.
Here’s a handy website for tracking the progress:
[www.project2025.observer](http://www.project2025.observer)
Before the unhinged comments that would be typical from some people on here…
he’s speaking so that Carney’s Cabinet actually understands the Trump mindset, and how can they pivot so Canada can maximize our outcome while still satisfying Trump.
Football Coaching 101 – you can’t compete in a game against your opponent unless you understand their playbook.
Okay, i am pretty close a partisan Liberal, but this seems like a move someone who has hit a wall will make. This guy giving a TED talk to the Canadian federal government is not going to help us either secure a deal with the US or help us move on if we don’t.
I think this is a little bit of „know your enemy“ strategy here.
Carney isn’t going to be falling for Project 2025, but if there’s anyone who knows the key principles driving the current US administration, it will be this Roberts guy.
This is one of the most evil people in the world in my opinion and I don’t care what perspective he has to share with our government even if we are worse off having not received it from him directly. I don’t think he or his organization should have any contact with our government whatsoever. I suppose this may not be a substantive comment, but we deal with the US administration because we have to. We do not have to do this.
This is straight up “Art of War” type stuff. You have to know your opponents mindset. I really like the way this government is paying attention to experts, even if this is a little unconventional. We need to do unconventional and different in this country right now so bring it on.
Reminds me of the Machiavellian advice. Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer. As long as the article is correct about the reason for this session it seems smart.