Ein palästinensischer Staat wäre gut für Israel: Die Chance für eine zweistaatliche Lösung besteht immer noch-aber es wird nicht lange nicht
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/israel/palestinian-state-would-be-good-israel
Ein palästinensischer Staat wäre gut für Israel: Die Chance für eine zweistaatliche Lösung besteht immer noch-aber es wird nicht lange nicht
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/israel/palestinian-state-would-be-good-israel
4 Kommentare
This analysis has many interesting points. Haas argues that a Palestinian state is less of a threat to Israel because it will have an incentive to rein in terrorism while currently violence is an outlet for a people who are stateless with little hope of having a state. That argument makes sense to me. The counter argument would be that what if a newly formed Palestine state elects a Hamas govt that does not rein it in and the violence continues.
Idiotic take.
We had a Palestinian state 2005-2025. It promoted terrorism and was a major security risk for Israel.
As long as the Palestinian people want to fight, whatever government they have will always have an incentive to fight Israel or be replaced by a group who will.
People who on paper who support a two state solution but then write essays say a one state solution will somehow be inevitable baffle me.
A one state solution (and the status quo) being unviable in basically any possible world is why anyone would support a two state solution to start with.
And yes a Palestinian state is the best longterm solution for the conflict but only one with strong meaningful security guarantees.
>The Chance for a Two-State Solution Still Exists
At this point, even that hippie „One Secular, Multicult, State“ looks more realist, sorry.