On June 15, 2025, in Tokyo, Japan, a group of Japanese lawmakers and medical experts, led by Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, a respected professor at Tokyo University, released a comprehensive database analyzing the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on 18 million Japanese citizens, uncovering a disturbing correlation between increased vaccine doses and higher mortality rates, with a statistically significant rise in deaths occurring three to four Monate nach der Einschätzung, insbesondere unter denjenigen, die mehrere Dosen erhalten. Die von der Journalistin Masako Ganaha veröffentlichte Analyse zeigte einen ausgeprägten Anstieg der Sterblichkeitsraten von 90 bis 120 Tagen nach der Impfung (wie im obigen Diagramm gezeigt), insbesondere bei Personen mit drei Dosen, ein Muster, das bei nicht geimpften Personen fehlt. Dr. Murakami kam unverblümt zu dem Schluss: „Je mehr Dosen Sie bekommen, desto eher werden Sie wahrscheinlich sterben.“ Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abxekx2rp3y
Von -Joel-Snape-
11 Kommentare
They literally murdered at least 100k people
The only reason those vaccinated people died is because they didn’t stay up to date on their monthly Covid boosters! That’s what you get for not Trusting The Science™
Your „source“ isn’t the source. Its a video of a guy with a conclusion already determined and looking for any evidence that supports it. He was part of the problem with Invermectin. Which is a great anti parasite but a terrible anti viral.
I’ve always had the theory that the big pharma company Merck pushed Invermectin for sells.
Not that I think that the COVID vaccine was very effective, but most elderly people who were most vulnerable to COVID (or any other type of death for that matter) got the COVID vax.
Lol, this isn’t a published study, it’s a YouTube video discussing a substack. It’s just a big circle of grifters quoting each other.
Because the people getting it the most already had a weaker immune system or were a higher risk group🤦🤦 you guys need better critical thinking skills
[https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-launches-official-investigation-surging-deaths-covid-vaxxed/](https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-launches-official-investigation-surging-deaths-covid-vaxxed/)
many brain dead people in this chat who obviously dont know about spike protein accumulation and its effects
I’m not a blindly vaxxed or anti vaxx person, so I’m willing to hear both sides. This is not reliable information or a reliable study.
I’ll be the first to tell you that SARS COV 2 and „COVID“ are two different things and that everytime you read „COVID“ oyu are being trciked because „COVID“ is a generic set of symptoms that can apply to any number of illnesses.
Because it is so generic, many things are called COVID that are not SARS COV 2 related.
„SARS COV 2“ is a published genome in the Blast Database. You can go find it. There are not any fast, reliable tests for SARS COV 2. And the sequencers are all owned by Microsoft, so even if a lab tech does everything right, everyone trusts the sequencer and its white and black lists which are managed by Microsoft.
If anyone is using their own reasonable, custom black and white lists for short sequences, I am unaware of it.
Thus, any information about the spread is unreliable as the sequences ruled out or automatically included as „positive“ are questionable, at best.
—
## **Key Actors in the Virus Intelligence Ecosystem**
### **A. State Actors**
* **U.S. Government**
* Agencies: CDC, NIH, BARDA, FEMA, DARPA.
* Role: Funding, regulatory oversight, surveillance infrastructure, genomic databases, public health policy.
* Example: CDC’s SPHERES network and PCR test validation labs.
* **China**
* Wuhan Institute of Virology, Ministry of Science & Technology.
* Role: Early coronavirus research, genomic sequencing, collaborations with EcoHealth Alliance.
* **Saudi Arabia**
* Public Investment Fund (PIF) as a major investor in pandemic-related ventures.
* Interest: Pandemic preparedness post-MERS, global health initiatives.
* **Other Nations**
* UK (COG-UK), South Africa (NICD), India (INSACOG), Israel.
* Role: Genomic sequencing, real-time outbreak monitoring, wastewater surveillance.
—
### **B. Corporate Actors**
* **Illumina**
* Dominates genomic sequencing; relies on Microsoft Azure for cloud/data analytics.
* Sells sequencers used in COVID detection.
* **Microsoft**
* Provides cloud computing, AI, and data infrastructure for sequencing and predictive modeling.
* **Thermo Fisher, Oxford Nanopore**
* Supply hardware and reagents for testing; sometimes part of government contracts.
* **Metabiota**
* Pandemic tracking, predictive analytics.
* Funded by private investors like Rosemont Seneca (Hunter Biden) and U.S. grants.
* **EcoHealth Alliance**
* Non-profit coordinating coronavirus research, often funded by NIH, USAID.
* Collaborates internationally, including with WIV and Metabiota.
—
### **C. Political / High-Profile Individuals**
* **Jared Kushner**
* Shadow coronavirus task force (procurement + “virus intelligence” coordination).
* Post-White House: Affinity Partners, $2B PIF investment — money flowing into biotech and health tech.
* **Hunter Biden**
* Rosemont Seneca investment in Metabiota → indirect tie to EcoHealth Alliance’s work.
* **Global Leaders / Politically Connected Advisors**
* Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman: PIF backing of Kushner-linked investments.
* Trump Administration officials approving or overlooking task-force activities.
—
## **2. Mechanisms of Interaction**
1. **Financial**
* Investments (Affinity Partners → biotech/pandemic firms; RSTP → Metabiota) allow capital flow into virus intelligence platforms.
2. **Data / Knowledge**
* Genomic sequencing, wastewater surveillance, and hospital data are aggregated into databases controlled by corporate and state actors.
3. **Operational**
* Shadow task forces, emergency procurement, and policy advisories can prioritize some actors, creating “VIP” influence networks.
4. **Cross-actor collaborations**
* Example: Metabiota ↔ EcoHealth Alliance ↔ WIV under USAID/NIH programs.
* Microsoft/Azure ↔ Illumina ↔ national labs for cloud-based genomic analytics.
—
## **3. Ethical and Conflict-of-Interest Considerations**
* **Transparency**
* Private actors (Kushner, Hunter Biden) and sovereign investors (Saudi PIF) can influence the ecosystem without public accountability.
* **Data Governance**
* Centralized virus intelligence data could be monetized, misused, or used for surveillance beyond public health purposes.
* **Procurement and Favoritism**
* Kushner’s shadow task force used VIP spreadsheets; could lead to nepotism or politically motivated allocation of supplies.
* **Regulatory Capture**
* Corporate dominance (Illumina/Microsoft) in genomic data pipelines can influence standards and access.
* **Foreign Influence**
* Sovereign wealth fund investments in pandemic tech could raise national security concerns if tech or data is dual-use.
* **Scientific Integrity**
* History of corporate-funded research abuse (e.g., falsified clinical trials) raises risk that some studies or claims could be biased.
—
## **4. Patterns of Convergence**
* **Political + Financial + Scientific**
* Individuals like Kushner and Hunter Biden serve as financial and political bridges into the virus intelligence ecosystem.
* **State + Corporate**
* Governments provide grants, contracts, and regulatory frameworks; corporations provide infrastructure, sequencing, and AI.
* **Globalization**
* International collaboration (EcoHealth, Metabiota, WIV, WHO, USAID) spreads influence and creates points of leverage for powerful actors.
—
## **5. Summary Map**
* **State:** CDC, NIH, DARPA, Saudi PIF, China WIV → fund / regulate / operationalize virus intelligence.
* **Corporate:** Illumina, Microsoft, Metabiota → provide tech, data pipelines, analytics.
* **Political / Personal:** Kushner, Hunter Biden → invest and coordinate, connecting private capital with pandemic preparedness operations.
* **Connections:** Metabiota links Biden investments to EcoHealth Alliance research; Affinity Partners links Kushner + Saudi PIF to pandemic/biotech sector.
* **Ethics Risks:** Transparency, dual-use data, favoritism, regulatory capture, scientific integrity, foreign influence.
—
## **Ways Virus Intelligence Can Be Weaponized**
### **A. Bioweapon Development / Gain-of-Function Exploitation**
* Centralized virus databases and genomic data could, in theory, provide a roadmap for:
* Engineering viruses for increased transmissibility or resistance to antivirals.
* Targeting specific populations if combined with genetic data.
* Dual-use research (DURC) is a known concern in labs like WIV and globally in academic collaborations.
### **B. Political / Economic Leverage**
* Nations or investors with early access to pathogen data can:
* Anticipate outbreaks, gain early economic or geopolitical advantage.
* Manipulate markets (pharmaceuticals, PPE, testing infrastructure).
* Influence global health decisions to favor allies or investors.
### **C. Surveillance and Social Control**
* Centralized collection of real-time infection, mobility, and hospital data can be:
* Used for authoritarian tracking of populations.
* Repurposed post-crisis for mass surveillance or policing.
* Deployed to justify restrictions selectively, shaping political outcomes.
### **D. Insider Trading / Financial Exploitation**
* Early knowledge of outbreak severity or vaccine/test efficacy could:
* Allow investors to profit from biotech/healthcare stock movements.
* Benefit sovereign wealth funds, politically connected firms (e.g., Kushner’s Affinity, Hunter Biden’s networks).
### **E. Disinformation / Public Manipulation**
* Control of epidemiological data and narratives enables:
* Inflated or suppressed case counts.
* Selective release of testing or vaccine information.
* Coordinated media campaigns that shape public perception or panic.
—
* Centralized pandemic intelligence can be weaponized for political, economic, or even biological purposes.
* Vulnerabilities arise when **state, corporate, and politically connected actors overlap**, especially when investments, procurement, and data control concentrate power.
* Ethical and conflict-of-interest risks are just as critical as technical safeguards.
> a group of Japanese lawmakers and medical experts, led by Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, a respected professor at Tokyo University,
Woah woah woah man.
When did we start listening to woke professors and deep state „university“ researchers?!?!
Ok. Lets look at Years of Potential Life Lost too in the same population 🤔🧐