Ich stieß auf diesen Fall und fand ihn wirklich beunruhigend.

    Quelle: https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/bussinessman-sexual-assauging-girl-flight-5hjdbhz_2/

    Ein Geschäftsmann wurde verurteilt, einen Minderjährigen auf einem Flug in die Schweiz sexuell angegriffen zu haben, und das Schweizer Gericht gab ihm letztendlich nur eine Geldstrafe und es ist verboten, die nächsten fünf Jahre in die Schweiz einzudringen, um das Gefängnis zu vermeiden. Diese Entscheidung ist zutiefst beunruhigend und wirft ernsthafte Bedenken hinsichtlich der Rechenschaftspflicht auf, insbesondere angesichts der Schwere der Straftat.

    Ich poste hier, um die Geschichte nicht zu sensibilisieren, sondern weil ich versuche, besser zu verstehen, wie das Schweizer Rechtssystem mit solchen Fällen umgeht. Ist es üblich, dass schwerwiegende Straftaten mit finanziellen Strafen anstelle von Sorgerechtstrafen beigelegt werden?

    Hat dieser Fall auch in der Schweiz viel öffentliche oder Medienreaktionen hervorgerufen? Ich würde interessieren, ob es in solchen Situationen eine umfassendere Debatte über die Richtlinien für die Verurteilung oder die Reform gegeben hat.

    Ich bin wirklich neugierig, lokale Perspektiven zu hören. Vielen Dank im Voraus für alle Erkenntnisse.

    Bussinessman avoids jail after SA a minor on flight to Switzerland – Fined CHF 9,000 and banned for 5y
    byu/Nohokun inSwitzerland



    Von Nohokun

    Share.

    20 Kommentare

    1. This is our „justice“. But try to steal from a rich guy, they’ll throw away the key.

    2. Stock-Marsupial8851 on

      This is not just Switzerland. A similiar disturbing case on a Qatar flight: [https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/aug/19/woman-sexually-assaulted-on-flight-challenges-uk-rules-on-compensation](https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/aug/19/woman-sexually-assaulted-on-flight-challenges-uk-rules-on-compensation)

      And thank you for raising awareness… it is deeply unsettling to see that sexual assault while traveling is on the rise, and how unprepared the system is. And in general, how much the victim has to go through.

    3. iamnogoodatthis on

      While this is shoddy sentence, you did miss out the important point that he was in custody from March until the sentencing was delivered, ie 6 months, which means that his 18 month suspended sentence does not need to be served. Yes it’s very short, but it’s not nothing.

      Also, a bit of a devil’s advocate counterpoint: how much should Swiss taxpayers pay to imprison foreigners instead of the much cheaper option of just deporting and banning them? Their home country can lock them up if they want to.

      Of course, light sentencing might lead to higher incidence, so if that’s a deliberate choice then the proceeds ought to be invested into other deterrents

    4. >Is it common for serious offenses to be resolved with financial penalties instead of custodial sentences?

      How comes you know it’s a „serious offense“ if you don’t know how the Swiss legal system works? There are criteria how to judge something, after all, that’s what every legal system in the world does – or is at least supposed to do: come to a judgment based on legal standards. Judging the severity of something is part of the process. So, if you think you know that it was „serious“ it seems you have insider information we all don’t have.

      I am, honestly, annoyed by the number of people who think they are entitled to have an opinion on such matters from afar, just because, well, they feel like it.

      In Switzerland there are standards how to handle rape cases like this one. Your post is, for example, omitting the not-so-unimportant detail that the man was held in custody since March, so roughly 5 months of time by the publication of the article. It is common practice in Switzerland that for a prison sentence the custody time is subtracted. Given he was sentenced for 1.5 years jail (see your own article), if you deduct the 5 months, that’s roughly 13 months of jail time remaining. According to Swiss law, if the offender has no prior crime history, it is also common practice to actually not send people to prison for short sentences if there is no good reason to assume they will commit serious crimes outside again. Why the 1.5 years and not 2 or 10 or 20 or lifelong prison – we do not know, there are no details provided by the article on what exactly happened.

      So, stop sensationalizing the story, that’s precisely what you are doing. If you want to imply that the Swiss law system is somehow intentionally or unintentionally supporting rape, then just state your case, but provide solid evidence for it, not a single article taken out of context with missing information.

    5. Euphoric_Salt1570 on

      Honestly doesn’t surprise me. There are many examples of very light fines to horrific crimes here. 

    6. Story has been discussed previously^. Here some threads:

      * [https://www.reddit.com/r/askswitzerland/comments/1mwzuxr/swiss_corruption_examples/](https://www.reddit.com/r/askswitzerland/comments/1mwzuxr/swiss_corruption_examples/)
      * [https://www.reddit.com/r/Switzerland/comments/1mv8fru/ohne_worte/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Switzerland/comments/1mv8fru/ohne_worte/)
      * [https://www.reddit.com/r/askswitzerland/comments/1mw6wbr/is_it_only_in_switzerland_that_criminals_get/](https://www.reddit.com/r/askswitzerland/comments/1mw6wbr/is_it_only_in_switzerland_that_criminals_get/)

    7. curiossceptic on

      In general the legal system in Switzerland puts less emphasis on punishment and more emphasis on preventing future crimes.

    8. Sad-Airline-3031 on

      That article is written with some sensational language without any details. I’m not defending the guy, but there are no concrete facts in the article.

      He was detained since March and deported with a suspended sentence. He is not allowed to enter Switzerland and cannot engage in any activity with a minor for life. The 9k is for the proceedings; it isn’t a fine. This is what the court costs.

      If the judge states the sentence is „barely appropriate“ then it is obvious they wanted him deported instead of taking Swiss taxpayer money to house him.

      His career is likely over, and if he had his family in Switzerland, well, they will be heading back to India too. Assuming he is an Indian national, he would be tried in India too, right? And there can be a trial in the country of the victim, no?

      I’m probably missing something, but I don’t understand what this has to do with Switzerland and reforms for sentencing guidelines.

    9. Brofessorofnothing on

      as a broader debate… don‘t send your children on flights all by themselves… seriously how could you? things like that shouldn‘t happen of course but they do so if you ask me the parents and that pos businessman are at fault.

    10. alpha_berchermuesli on

      I’d hate to pay tax money for this sort of cunt. We can’t shoot them so best have them pay a fine and kick them out to whatever hole they came from. If he was a swiss citizen, I would certainly hope for jail-time, huge fine and restitution for life.

    11. RoastedRhino on

      I was hoping (for lack of a better term) to read some details about inappropriate brief touching, for example when the girl was passing by this man’s seat or something.

      It’s not that. It was a sexual assault. It was disgusting and the girl is now left to handle the consequences of that.

    12. GearHonest8140 on

      Ok I looked up the post @Toeffli linked in one of the comments and here’s why the sentence is so light (post is in german btw.):

      He was offered a plea deal which all parties aka the offender, victim and judge agreed to it. Because of that the whole thing was a summary process rather then a normal (often longlasting) trial. That’s the reason why he got off lightly.
      Here are some additional clarification (which I hopefully understood correctly), just in case some questions arise:

      • Summary processes (Schnellverfahren) only happen if a plea deal is offered (with a full confession to everything)

      • the victim has to be informed of the plea deal and the occuring consequences and has to agree/be ok with it otherwise the deal can’t happen in the first place

      • a judge can either accept or deny the deal, but he can’t make changes to it

      • the reasons those deals are often offered (and why a victim might agree woth it) is to prevent a „proper“ trial that could cause more stress on the victim and/or if there is a risk that the outcome would be that the offender get’s off even lighter or won’t be convicted at all

      If I made an error here, I apologise. Also for potential wrong terms since english is my third language.

      Here is the link Toeffli provided. You can find the informations in the comments:
      https://www.reddit.com/r/Switzerland/comments/1mv8fru/ohne_worte/

      Edit: formating

    13. Yeah, everyone defending this verdict is a sick human being. No way around it the system is fucked.

    14. MaisJeNePeuxPas on

      He’s probably looking into Canadian visas now so he can continue his career as a long-distance flight rapist.

    Leave A Reply