Share.

    31 Kommentare

    1. _crazyboyhere_ on

      Sources: [Median household income](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?rid=249&eid=259515#snid=259516), [Education attainment ](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?eid=391444&rid=330), [Life expectancy ](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-visualization/state-life-expectancy/index_2021.htm), [Poverty rate ](https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2024/demo/acsbr-022.pdf), [Violent crime rate ](https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/downloads) and
      [Median home price ](https://www.zillow.com/research/data/)

      Tools: [Datawrapper ](https://www.datawrapper.de/)

      For median household income, education attainment and life expectancy, being higher than the US average means better.

      For poverty rate, violent crime rate and median home price, being below the US average means better

    2. As a PA resident, I’m gonna call BS on any metric that has Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska over us…and the Dakotas on the same level

    3. amazingBiscuitman on

      17 fives and sixes, 11 ones. slightly over half the states are really great or really suck. i’d like to see a red/blue state overlay

    4. TheChewyWaffles on

      Paid for by the National Flyover States Association.

      Seriously seems a little surprising to me as someone from the Midwest

    5. What is driving Michigan so low?  That’s kind of insane to me as a person who lives here. What is your methodology? 

      Is this just the aggregate of times it’s higher than the average across all categories or is this an average of all scores?

    6. I have lived in a 4 a 2 and a 1 and this mostly checks out though I would give the 2 a 3.

    7. DigitalArbitrage on

      If unemployment rate by state was included in the formula then many of the current 1’s would go up and many of the 5’s would go down.

    8. Someone (maybe you) posted this the other day and deleted it because it was largely junk.

      Even if it wasn’t, there’s no reason why low median home prices would necessarily be a good thing in the way low crime and low poverty is. Significantly more Americans live in a home they own than rent, and they’d probably prefer higher median prices.

    9. UnforseenSpoon618 on

      Gonna be a bit honest, but also a bit biased, that after living in Minnesota for a LONG time that compared to the neighbors (of Minnesota) this is entirely accurate.

      The downside is that it is also more heavily taxed than the nearby states. When you look at that, you can honestly see where the taxes go to when it comes to quality of the overall state infrastructure though.

    10. Luminous-Savior on

      How is Hawaii so high?  House prices… Educational attainment?… poverty rate…

      That’s 3 there they wouldnt be over average.

    11. TarHeelinRVA on

      NC being on the same level as WV is WILD. I’m from NC originally and live in VA now and the living experiences have been very similar. Nothing close to what you have here.

    12. KevinDean4599 on

      looks like a mix of expensive and less expensive states with scores in the 5. Iowa and Colorado and Washington all rank a 5 despite big differences in cost of living.

    13. PhantomSimmons on

      MINISODA

      Well considering that a brutal school shooting happened there yesterday I don’t know what to think about that data.

    14. Feels like these metrics will by default overly favors urban areas vs rural areas.

      In general rural areas will have lower income, lower education (it is not needed for a majority of the jobs there), higher poverty rate (based on national standards), etc. They will have significantly lower medium house prices though, and just generally cheaper everything.

      Thing is you could have a much better life with 50k in the country than with 100k in NYC but these metrics would say you don’t.

      The map isn’t necessarily bad but all the metrics are quantifiable ones (which makes sense for a map like that) while most of the qualitative ones (quality of life, stress, environment, general happiness, etc) are not.

    15. NoAardvark5889 on

      As a fellow Midwesterner, I’m also surprised by some of these rankings. The methodology behind them is definitely the most important factor here.

    16. The funny thing about this data is that a lot of the „1“ states you can still afford to buy a house lol

    17. DynamicHunter on

      Having lived in California and Texas, and just recently visited Washington & Oregon on a 2 week long road trip, I understand their scores tbh

    18. sarcasticorange on

      Anything using a national Poverty rate is going to be horribly skewed. $30k in Georgia and $30k in California are very different experiences.

    19. Considering income without considering expenses is an immediate nonstarter. People don’t live in expensive places unless there’s good reason like climate. Minnesota may rank #1 on these simplistic metrics but I would never want to live there, if for no other reason than the long winters and mosquito-infested summers.

    Leave A Reply