Die dritte Grand Jury weigert sich, die DC -Frau anzuklagen, die beschuldigt wird
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/for-third-time-grand-jury-refuses-to-indict-dc-woman-accused-of-assaulting-agent-during-ice-arrest-jeanine-pirro-sidney-reid-sandwich-guy/65-785e2e30-46cf-4e90-b81a-9e9c219c6750
22 Kommentare
A hat trick of failures for FOX News host Judge Jeanine
How about a 4th breakfast
We need to Weaponize jury nullification/ hung juries. Set a precedent. What will happen if prosecutors are unable to get conviction in cases involving direct action against this Administration and its goons? How many folks will sign up to be ICE when they know the citizens will treat them however they like without legal consequences?
Good on these folks for leading from the front.
Resist! They will definitely come after you if any of these people are indicted.
A grand jury would indict a ham sandwich.
Unless Trump is making the sandwich. That’s how bad the sandwich is.
Not what they had in mind when they came up with the three strikes policy.
More of this. Resist and obstruct fascism by every means possible.
Beginning to wonder what else people might not be willing to indict for when kidnapper thugs in masks grab and assault citizens? ICE better start being a lot more careful. One day people will become willing to test it and see. I mean, if they feel like there is nothing left to lose, yeah, that probably is going to happen. ICE should be mindful that when that day comes, it will be over for THEM not us because there are many, many millions more of us than them and we haven’t even begun to fight.
Muh waste, fraud, and abuse
3 strikes you’re out, right?
Would be curious if her defense would weaponize this information in court. Without new evidence it lends itself to malicious prosecution if they keep convening grand juries to seek a conviction.
Are they just going to continue putting it in front of grand juries until one of them indickts ‚em“
They had this problem in LA too. And with McCabe during Trump’s first term.
It’s a sign of craptacular choices in prosecutors.
This is the way.
How many jeopardy?
If anyone is wondering what a political witch hunt *actually* looks like, this is it. Being shot down by a grand jury on three separate occasions means this case is weak af, especially since no evidence nor arguments to defend Ms. Reid are introduced to the grand jury at this stage in prosecution. So even without thinking of what defenses Ms. Reid has for allegedly causing „scrapes to the back of [the FBI agent’s] hand“ three separate grand juries did not think a federal indictment was proper for this charge.
A grand jury could indict a ham sandwich but after three times they couldn’t convince a grand jury? Most people wouldn’t waste the resources after the first time
Why should they? All these guys wear no identifiable markings. No Trump supporter to date has explained how I am supposed to know if the white guy in face mask and jeans is ice or just a guy with a gun in the most common outfit in America…
Now let’s see if they can indict a guy who threw a ham sandwich. This is all so dumb.
Sorry, your honor, but stopping a crime isn’t a crime.
Grand Jury is a super low bar to pass, and without the Defense even being present. The problem in LA was that ICE was incompetent and constantly got caught in lies.
3rd??
If only they worked this hard at convicting child rapists .
Release the Epstein files !!
Rise up!