Künstliche Intelligenz übertrifft Ärzte bei der genauen Beurteilung von Augenproblemen

„GPT-4 – a ‘large language model’ – was tested against doctors at different stages in their careers, including unspecialised junior doctors, and trainee and expert eye doctors. Each was presented with a series of 87 patient scenarios involving a specific eye problem, and asked to give a diagnosis or advise on treatment by selecting from four options.

GPT-4 scored significantly better in the test than unspecialised junior doctors, who are comparable to general practitioners in their level of specialist eye knowledge.

GPT-4 gained similar scores to trainee and expert eye doctors – although the top performing doctors scored higher.

The researchers say that large language models aren’t *likely to replace healthcare professionals*, but have the potential to improve healthcare as part of the clinical workflow. **“**

# In my opinion, most likely to Replace Doctors in the future no matter what the author in the article says which I feel is just a Cooperate PR way of saying we have invented something to replace U but it won’t, which I also think is sad coz I like my doctor she listens to me more than anything.

Keep in mind that medicine has always been developing machines to diagnose people.  The x-ray machine is better at diagnosing a broken bone than an expert doctor (less painful too).  The doctors value is in fixing the broken bone, not in dating, „well that’s a broken bone“.  

You want to know what AI really messes up the medical profession?  Self driving cars.  About a quarter of all medical work flows out of car accidents.